User talk:2001:2D8:6F2E:ED7D:C1C5:A78A:F1B9:34E

Ono Susumu is a Japanese linguist asserting relations between Japanese and Dravidian and Austronesian. Problem is that he is not a specialist in Korean language. His only example for his Austonesian theory is the word "Phuwa" and he says it is a Korean word meaning lung, but this word doesn't exist in Korean. In native Korean, lung is 허파 (heopa). I personally tried to contact him to figure out what the heck this is, but he is already dead. This mysterious word "phuwa" which is of course not Korean, is the only clue supporting his Austronesian theory. Unlike his absurd Austonesian theory, the Dravidian theory is considered "should not be overlooked" by many Korean linguists. A contributor brought the Ono Susumu's kindling again. I ask 1. not to correlated between Austonesian and Dravidian. Treat the two language stocks separately. 2. not to cite the Ono Susumu's old paper from 1998.