User talk:2001:4455:1A9:E100:E803:81C5:3A4F:F84

January 2022
Please stop reverting other's good article nominations, as you did at Talk:Friday Night Funkin'. WP:GA clearly states: "Any editor, preferably one who creates or contributes to an article, who believes that the article meets the good article criteria, may nominate the article for an impartial reviewer to assess." wizzito &#124;  say hello!  06:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Wizzito, it would appear you are not familiar with how GA works, and in particular the GA nomination instructions page: Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. As the nominator at Talk:Friday Night Funkin' has made an out-of-process nomination, it is appropriate for the editor whose talk page this is, or any other editor, to revert said nomination. While any editor may nominate an article, if that editor has not made a significant contribution to the article (as is the case here), they need first to do a consultation and see what the consensus is of those who have done significant work on the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, I understand. I'm sorry. I'm just more concerned with an IP harassing me saying that I'm mad that I failed my first GAN (which I did significantly contribute to). And all the harassment I've faced lately, especially by anonymous IPs wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  06:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * since the first ping didn't go through (sorry if you were pinged twice) wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  06:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Doesnt mean all IPs are the same person. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:B01E:4F31:9E38:D9BB (talk) 06:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I wasn't talking about you. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  06:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)