User talk:2001:448A:302D:1E7B:517E:EA01:F534:629E

December 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to SMK Negeri 10 Bandung, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 04:49, 20 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Your edits to SMK Negeri 10 Bandung are contrary to the manual of style and have included unexplained removal of content and sources. This is disruptive editing. Please discuss on the talk page what you want to try to achieve in this article and then we can help you do so in a correct and proper manner. Thank you . &mdash; Archer1234 (talk) 04:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi 2001:448A:302D:1E7B:517E:EA01:F534:629E! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of SMK Negeri 10 Bandung several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. ''

While including some good parts, other parts of your edits appear to be contrary to the manual of style and others include unexplained removals of content, maintenance tags, date directives, and sources. This appears to be disruptive editing, especially when fellow editors have good-faith concerns about the edits.

As communication is required to resolve disputes, I have started a new discussion topic on the talk page. You are invited, in good faith, to share your views, opinions and perspectives with the goal of achieving consensus for the edits that should be retained and those that should not be retained. I look forward to reading your views on the talk page.

Thank you. &mdash;''. Archer1234 (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)