User talk:2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C

The official Wuchale treaty signed on 1889
2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C, again I am deleting the statement under quotation in biograhy of Menelik II because it is not found in the Official Wuchale treaty as it can be clearly seen here: The Official Treaty of Wuchale. It is not also stated even in the wikipedia article here: Treaty of Wuchale. Besides the source provided was not in English, since this wikipeia is for English speakers there should be another source with English preferably the original official wuchale treaty itself. Moreover, the article number is not provided in which the quoted statement is found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EthiopianHabesha (talk • contribs)

As you see the Source for the quote is Not the Treaty of Wuchale, therefore you can not delete something just like that. The Treaty of Wuchale Article in Wikipedia is Not complete to begin with. There are many letters and communications, written and verbal that had transpired between Emperor Menelik and the Italians, the British, the French, and other European powers. I recommend you develop the treaty of wuchale Article instead of just deleting a sourced quote on this article.2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 03:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C, once again I am deleting the quoted statement for the 4 resons I mentioned above. let me add the 5th reason: the quotation begins by saying "Upon the treaty with Italy, Emperor Menelik II in 1889 stated:" what treaty is it, and from what article number is the quotaion extracted? If you have seen and confirmed the source yourself then let us know. We all know that all official international treaties between nations have names, dates and article numbers. Any historian has the right to forward his own personal opinion based on what is stated on the original treaty but in anyways he connot present his opinion just like as stated in the treaty. So until you confirm the source and give us the name, date and article number of the treaty under quotation, which begins as it was stated by emperor Menelik, then I suggest it should be deleted.- EthiopianHabesha (talk) 12:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

To EthiopianHabesha or HistoryofHAbesha, since you are using two different accounts to edit this article. Your reasoning is not valid enough to delete a Cited quote or statement. The way the quote and source is written, it is saying that "upon treaty", Menelik stated which is not something that is necessarily written down in a Treaty. The Treaties not only of Wuchale but the other Treaties with British, France, etc that Menelik of Shoa signed had many communications, letters, and verbal accounts between the ambassadors and Menelik. Again, you can add what you want, but You can not just Outright Delete a CITED sourced data. I ask again, please do NOT Delete Something just like that. You are deleting based on your own Personal opinion. And you can not simply use the Treaty of Wuchale (Ucciali) (the first version) as your only source. You should also know there was an Amendment to the Treaty. Menelik had no issue with "NOT" claiming Eritrea as part of his "Empire". Infact, he and Ras Mangasha were competing for the title of "Emperor of Ethiopia", Go read about the Mareb(Merab) conventions. Go read about Menelik working with the Italians in one of those communications to wage war on Atsi Yohanis. This Wiki article is NOT Even scratching the Surface of what truly Transpired between, Menelik, the Italians, the British, French, Ras Mangasha, Ras Alula...etc! AGAIN Please do NOT DELETE CITED SOURCED Data. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: I have got nothing to do with the user HistoryofEthiopia. Once again my issue is with the quotation. You are just saying it might be: 1)verbal account: if so then with who? when? and where? 2) A letter: if so for whom? by whom? When? 3)Treaties with other countries: if so then with which particular country? When? Name of treaty? Article number? My question for you is that: if you can confirm the source yourself, speak German then how is it hard for you to give us answers for all those questions? If you can't be able to confirm the source yourself and give us an answer then let it be deleted until the person who added the source himself complain for it's deletion and give us answers, then we discuss with him on weather it should be restored or not. Otherwise, how is it possible for you to convince us to accept a source that doesn't have answers for all the above questions? For those reasons I am deleting the quotation once again. You can't tell an educated person not to ask questions and tell him just to accept whatever you told him so! EthiopianHabesha (talk) 21:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I am not sure who added the source, you can go back to the history of this article. I am of the opinion that you do not just Delete something without confirmation. I recommend you add an "verification needed" tag on it. I will revert it if you delete it. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: Then why do you yourself keep on deleting the other guys paragraphs (HistoryofEthiopia and 97.116.164.244) added with very appropriate sources, offcourse by citing the original official Wuchale treaty? What makes you think you can be able to delete while others are not in anyways allowed to delete? Atleast I have given over 6 reasons to delete the quotation but I thought you are just keep on deleting their paragraphs without out even giving them a single reason. Since wikipedia is an open source anyone can add any paragraph so long us the source is provided and can be confirmed. Let's be civilized and solve the issue with discussion. By the way the quotation being there or not will not change anything politically/nationally. If you want to be a proud Eritrean who has got nothing to do with Ethiopia/Amhara/Tigre then be it. Nationality is something that can be changed and every year 100s of thousands of Ethios/Eris are changing their nationality in West, Asia etc and Ofcourse I don't believe I will change a single person's mind by adding/removing quotation from Wikipedia. So, I am not here for nationalistic agenda, am just here for sharing Knowledge and sharing the truth and if I am provided answers for the above questions infact I will be the first person to restore the quotation. - EthiopianHabesha (talk) 23:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

To EthiopianHabesha, you and HistoryofEthiopia keep deleting the Cited Sourced Quote and then continue to Add Minor Edits which makes it hard to Revert to the Sourced Cited Quote. You can argue all you want but it is not correct to Delete a Cited Source. I even put a "verification needed" comment with that Quote, but You decided to just Delete it anyways. You are not being correct here by Deleting and then doing Minor edits via HistoryofEthiopia's edits. Let the Quote stand so that it can be Verified otherwise Deleting it is the same as trying to Block it because you nor I can read German does Not Make the Quote Go away nor the Source invalid. I will revert the Quote again, if you and HistoryofEthiopia which I suspect is the same person Deletes the Quote again, I will and it should be viewed that Both of You are Vandalising on this article.2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C|2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C

Hello, first, I am not the same as the user EthiopianHabesha (In fact, I have an issue with his quotes which are unfounded and without source) my changes are more so to correct the deficiencies and the biases of the article. Parts of the article, refer to false statements and incorrect or non-verifiable sources. Additionally, the wording of the article are clearly biased. I am attempting to push the article more on the neutral side and I have provided verifiable sources for every edit I have done. For instance, I added the pdf version of the treaty for everyone to look at. And every statement I referenced it by saying "see article XYZ" of the article. I understand why you deleted EthiopianHabesha's quote and edits, however, what is your issue with my edits. Furthermore, who is going to check your biases. Apparently, you know more about this part, then why not do us all a favor and write the article the right way. If not, then let us do the edits, go verify and leave the correct one. HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To HistoryofEthiopia, this Article is So Far Not Neutral when you have things stating "Eritrea, a former Abysinnian province" or "Menelik gave up or ceded Abysinnian territory " blah blah, that is NOT Neutral, that is the Talking points of a Biased View. Obviously, the country of Eritrea exists as Independent and Separate from Ethiopia. Again, I ask you nor EthiopianHabesha stop deleting Sourced meaning "CITED" data without first Verifying the Source. There are many sources on this Article that are from Russian, Amharic, etc but those do not Get deleted even if there is Contention. In fact, so far I have not seen "verification needed" on the Russian, Amharic, Italian...etc sources but as soon as this quote from I take it a German source has been here for several years so far from looking at the History of this Article, you and EthiopianHabesha Decide to DELETE it. Just because you disagree does not mean you get to DELETE it, it has a Source Cited, therefore you can't delete it with out verification and agreement amongst Wiki-editors etc! I will Revert it even If I have to delete your(EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia)'s MINOR edits!. You can add your Minor edits after I REVERT it! I have NO PROBLEMS with Edits as long as a Source is cited at this point and Other Wiki editors will do so. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: Once again I donot have anything to do with HistoryofEthiopia but I beleive he has the full right to add whatever sentences or paragraphs even a full article so long us it is sourced and confirmed. Also anyone has a right to delete anything and then discuss about it on weather it should be restored or not in a civilized way. As far as I know that's how Wikipedia works! There is a rule in Wikipedia which states that non English Sources should be accompanied with the non English quotation itself as well as a translation done by non Wikipedians. Please see the rule here WP:NONENG. Now based on this rule me or anyother person has the right to demand this criteria to be fulfield. So either yourself or the person who added it should come and give us the quotation in German accompanied with an English translation done by non wikipedians (the translator is also another source that should be added). Please note that there are other higher level Wikipedians who monitor if the rule of Wikipedia are implemented effectively for every articles. I believe since we are matured educated people I don't see why we can not read the rule ourself and solve the issue in civilized manner without anyone telling us to abide by the rule. - EthiopianHabesha (talk) 09:23, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: this is HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC) (not EthiopiaHabesha). Why are you bent on showing the emperor in bad light. The source you are fighting to preserve is unconfirmed and is the German language which no one understands. And why are you bent on showing racism and ethnocentrism and portraying the emperor as bad. Those quotes were never said and there is no reliable source that can be found to indicate as such. I have cited sufficient sources to support the changes I made and these sources directly contradict what you keep putting on there. Who are you and why are you doing this (are you CIA???) why sow seeds of divisions inside the article (such as Eritreans and Ethiopians are not the same, and that even the emperor said so blah blah. The emperor said no such things, his decision not to occupy Eritrea was political consideration where he clearly knew that if he occupied Eritrea, angry Italians would come back with all their might etc. I provided ample sources which you completely deleted.) AGAIN WHY THE F ARE YOU DOING THIS?????????????????????????????). Let us tell our own history you racist pig. You have told enough lies about us. HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: please stop your racist and ethnocentric agenda. We have provided reliable and verifiable sources for the changes. The sources you keep putting on there are completely unreliable, furthermore, it is in German, if you can read German good for you. Now stop manipulating our history. Can't you find a better job than dividing black people. Be productive go make peace or give some charity, stop your evil. HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

To EthiopianHabesha/HistoryofEthiopia, I can't believe you pulled the "Race Card" on me. This is ridiculous...I will re-instate the Cited Quote and give an opportunity to be Verified, if You DELETE once again, you and your other Account are Vandalising. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: now you have flagged the copy of "The Official Treaty of Wuchale" so that it cannot be posted on Wikipedia. You did this because the official document goes directly against the ethnocentric story you want to tell. You keep deleting the document of the treaty (which is in English and Clearly visible for everyone to see and make their own judgment on, you did this because it does not comport to your own "opinion or agenda." If the source we provided is questionable, then it is ok. But you delete things without explanation or made up explanation. You are a racist pig. You don't want black people portrayed in good light, you want them to fight one against the other. You promote hate. HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 20:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I did no such thing. I've explained why I had to revert your minor edits because you and your other Account (EthiopianHabesha) have been DELETING ..>DELETING Cited Data and then you add your Minor Edits to make it Impossible of Reverting without having to Undo your Minor Edits! 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C:

First, you are so ignorant about Ethiopians that you think everything that has Ethiopia or Habesha is the same. For the f'n last time, I have nothing to do with EthiopiaHabesha (read my name tag, it says "HistoryofEthiopia" you du*b f**k).

Second, you have vertually sabotaged the article with your own doing. I will not let your lies go unchecked. I have provided sufficient sources that directly contradict your racist and ethnocentrist lies. I provided "The Official Treaty of Wuchale" which you deleted then flagged so it cannot be cited inside wikipedia. We are Ethiopians and we tell our own story, we will not let you tell lies. Let us black people tell our own stories. The changes I made were supported by reliable sources. Your sources were unreliable and completely fabricated, to make matters worse, the source you use to support "your opinion and agenda" are in "German" language. Wikipedia "english" should be supported with "English" sources.

Third, you have destroyed the article rather than let people who know the history and have sufficient source to support what they are saying contribute to the article. You are one racist pig. We Ethiopians don't sit around and let you tell our story for us, we tell our own story and we will fight back. Let us tell our own story HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 01:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To HistoryofEthiopia, I have NOT done anything that You have ACCUSED me of! I have done nothing of destroying this Article....but I will Review the Article and call out what I see is wrong. Now I have NOT deleted anything that you have added. I simply Added Back the Quote and Added "verification needed". I think I am being fair here to you. Please keep the hostilities to a bare minimum of zero. Wikipedia is NOT owned specifically by You nor Ethiopians Nor any One Group. The Story of Menelik, the Man, will be told...Like I've stated, Wikipedia Does Not Even Scratch the Surface on this Personality let alone even Greater Figures in History. Please do not take offense to me permitting all sources an opportunity to be heard. I think openness is key to understanding. If you want to rant off on a Soapbox then go ahead, Wikipedia belongs to everyone that includes those Who have Something bad to say about Menelik as well. If there is a source provided, the data can remain. My adding of "verification needed" is being very reasonable, however you and EthiopianHabesha just wish to DELETE and FORGET!, I will Not PERMIT that and I will keep Re-adding it until it is Verified! 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 01:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: You have deleted every change I have made, (every single one of them), and I have provided sources that contradict what you keep changing the article to. Your quote is completely fabricated and even the source that is on there is in the German language. So, if the quote is unreliable and like you said "verification needed," why are you fighting tooth and nail to keep such "unreliable source." That language of the quote has huge significance, and if you are going to put it up there, then I suggest you first verify the source and make sure it is reliable. You are not being fair, you have a specific story you want to tell and you are fighting to tell that story. Just because wikipedia does not belong to me, it does not mean you can publish all the r*cist and ethnocntric stuff you want on there. IF WIKIPEDIA BELONGS TO EVERYONE, WHY THE f* IS IT THAT ONLY "WHAT YOU SAY" GETS TO BE ON IT? Leave Ethiopians to tell their story, what is it with you and not letting us black people have control over our own story? YOU ARE A R*CIST P*G,HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 01:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To HistoryofEthiopia, I've only kept a Cited Source around for it be VERIFIED! What is wrong with that? While you DELETE and then add Minor Edits to cover your tracks. Please stop being RUDE and insulting here...calling me a "R*CIST P*G" will not change anything here. Again please STOP Deleting CITED/SOURCED Data. I've added a "verification needed" to this Quote. What more do you want other than your POV cancelling out Opposing Views of which this Quote apparently is to you!

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C:You know what the problem is. You know exactly what you are doing. Why are you putting UNVERIFIED sources on there. I have told you the significance of the Quote, and I have repeatedly told you I have no issue if you can find verifiable source. The source itself is fabricated (and you can clearly see it). THAT IS WHY IT CANNOT BE "VERIFIED." You cannot verify a lie because it is a lie. So, unless you have source to support the words you claim the emperor said, then stop putting it on there. And when someone tried to correct it, stop interfering unless you have contrary source. I know why you are doing this, your opinion is what matters, apparently you know our history better than us. All I am saying is, let us tell our story, if you can find source that is reliable and verifiable then ok, I have no issue with that. But this is my History and I will not let you vandalize it or have your way with it. If you don't want to be called r*cist, then stop acting like one. HistoryofEthiopia (talk) 03:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

To 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C: Hey let's be civilized here! The opposite of civilization is Savageness! At once all human beings were savages meaning the rule of law is unknown and people just group themselves into small clans and raid one another, rape each other and disrespect each other. Revenge attack and lawlessness is two of the biggest characteristics of Savagness. Now what is your problem in deleting the whole article under Menelik and blaming it on me and HistoryofEthiopia? I beleive we are dealing with a civilized organization called Wikipedia! You do clearly know that savageness is replied by another biggest savageness! Now you have to keep in mind that removing the whole article under Menelik will invite hositlities from other disgruntled Ethiopians following our dialogue who may reply with revenge attack and deleting all Eritrean pages. And what is with with you adding { {weasel words} } everywhere? Since you write a good English am assuming you are an educated person and so am I! And now I don't know why we cannot solve the issue in a civilized way? Wether we like it or not we are under the rule of Wikipedia. If we cannot leave by the rule then we are going into our precivilization age i.e. ofcourse heading to savageness. And it's upto you which direction you want to go? If you decide to play lawlesness, oh trust me there are many angry people following our dialogue and will definitely play into the same game you have chosen. Personaly, I donot want to solve the issue that way. Once again I'll ask you politely to please look into the rule here WP:NONENG, take a few seconds and read it. It says non English Sources should be accompanied with the non English quotation itself as well as a translation done by non Wikipedians (the translator is also another source that should be included). Now if this criterea is fulfilled then I have absolutely no problem if the quoatation stays. As I said previously I am not here for nationalistic agenda and I also beleive if there is any wrongdoing by any person and can be proven and sourced properly with neutral/independent scholoars (preferably non Horn of African scholars who have no nationalistic/political agenda) then it should definitely be stated. After all humans are not angels and everyone did and will make mistakes most definitely. Isayas Afeowrke, Meles Zenawi and Mengistu Hailemariam all of them have some negative/positive history and I personaly beleive all their history should be written. — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 16:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I got the user who added these quotations and his user name is Puhleec. Just go through the history under Menelik page and see the changes made on "19:49, 4 May 2013‎". Infact he is an active user as can be seen here: Contributions, his last contribution was on 23 may on Menelik page. Since he is the one who added it, and since he will get this message perhaps he is going to give us the quotation in German Language accompanied by the English translation plus two sources (for the German and the translator) based on wikepedias rule here: WP:NONENG — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 12:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Menelik II has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Menelik II was changed by 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950702 on 2016-05-23T02:32:58+00:00.


 * Hello. I wanted to warn you about your behavior at the article Menelik II. It appears that you and another user are engaged in an edit war, reverting each other without discussion, and calling each other names on this talk page. This kind of edit warring and personal attacks must stop. It could get either or both of you blocked from editing. I have locked the page for one day to temporarily stop the edit warring, and to request both of you to discuss your differences, politely, on the article's talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello MelanieN. I have been polite with both HistoryofEthiopia and EthiopianHabesha. They have called me names go read on the Talk page between me and EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia. They or the same person have been in an Edit War. Go through the history, you will see they would delete something and then do a bunch of separate minor edits to make it impossible to revert the Deletion they did. Nonetheless, this article isn't really accurate and missing information of which HistoryofEthiopia/EthiopianHabesha delete because it goes counter to their POV.  They've used one "Treaty of Wuchale" as their Source to add Weasel worded entries into this article that promotes their POV. I discussed with them and I am done talking with them because they are too Hostile and unreasonable. The only thing I was doing was Reverting their Deletions except they set up their Deletions in a way that it was impossible to Revert without doing it manually.  I even Re-added the Deletion after they completed their other Minor Edits and they still deleted and Continued to Do multiple separate Minor Edits to Stop the Reverting/Re-adding of the Deleted item. I think you and other Admins should really watch what they are doing.2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * MelanieN, I want to speak on my behalf. As far as I know I never called him on names. As can be seen on the above of his talk page I have given him over 6 reasons why I keep on deleting a quotation added long time ago, probably more than a year ago. Some guy provided us the official Wuchale treaty and I couldn't be able to find the quotation through the treaty, so I continuously deleted it while giving him reasons for each revert. In addition to the 5 reasons I've given him above I tried to inform him that the source is not in English and it's hard for us to confirm and also is against wikipedia's rule: WP:NONENG. If he had issues with the source provided (which I believe is an Eitrean opposition site) I've added 2 more varied sources showing the Official Wuchale treaty here: Treaty of Wuchale 1889 Ethio-Italian Treaty of Wuchale 1889 Ethio-Italian, Official Wuchale treaty, Copy of the Original Wuchale Treaty with Seal and Signature  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EthiopianHabesha (talk • contribs) 22:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello MelanieN, I did not add the Quote nor the Source(s) that EthiopianHabesha speaks of. I only Reverted the deletion of the quote(s) and source(s) by EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia. That is all I did. I looked at the History of this Quote(s) and it has been here for many years. I added a "verification needed" against the quote but still EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia deleted it without a Real Discussion other than they (both of them) accusing me of being "racist" or a "racist pig"...etc!  If wikipedia permits this form of hostile discussion then I want no part of this. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 23:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What do you mean we didn't have real discussions? Are you saying all the above explanations I gave you as not discussion at all? It is very wrong to claim EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia are the same person without proof? Though we may have opinions we may share we also have lots of differences. I believe Wikipedia have access to our ip address & device spec and based on the rule one person cannot have two accounts then they would have blocked our accounts by now if there is any proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EthiopianHabesha (talk • contribs) 12:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok, hold it. About name calling: Reading through the posts above, it is clear that the only person insulting the others is History of Ethiopia. From him I see repeated insults: racist pig, ignorant, CIA, evil, etc. History of Ethiopia, I am warning you now and will repeat it on your talk page: you must STOP these personal attacks or you will be blocked from editing. To the IP 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C, you are doing something equally bad: you are repeatedly, without evidence, accusing History of Ethiopia and EthiopianHabesha of being the same person - in effect you are accusing them of sockpuppetry. As an administrator I do not see any evidence that they are the same person; they just happen to agree on something. Sockpuppetry is a serious charge; making it without evidence is a personal attack and could result in your being blocked if you keep it up. To sum up: History, stop the insults, 2001, stop calling the others sockpuppets. Have I made myself clear?
 * About discussion, it is clear that you three are not going to agree about the inclusion of that quote. You are just repeating the same arguments over and over. For now, stop the edit warring, and I will post at WikiProject Africa to see if we can get some help. --MelanieN (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * To MelanieN, if your records show that "EthiopianHabesha" and "HistoryofEthiopia" are not the Same Account holder, then fine. I didn't make an accusation by the way, I made an observation based on their posting around the same time and for the same reason. Also, I deleted the QUOTE by the way not because I agree with anyone in particular here but I do not care to be dragged into an edit war with EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia. Also, what is Wikipedia's policy on EthiopianHabesha of accusing me of "making threats" when I did no such thing? He made the comment on my talk page. Will also make it clear to EthiopianHabesha about False acussation WP:No personal attacks?  Am I offered an Equality in protection from this Wiki bullying that I faced by both EthiopianHabesha and HistoryofEthiopia where both did bring up "my race" or "if I am CIA" and the latest by EthiopianHabesha this false accusation that "I threatened" them? If not, then so be it, Wikipedia itself contradicts its own WikiBullying Policies. 2001:558:600A:83:6038:EDC9:C7AA:DB8C (talk) 07:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tigrayans, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See also: WP:POINT. Gyrofrog (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Legal threats
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 08:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * See here: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 08:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent edits to Talk:Tigrayans could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 08:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

tigrayan
the people of Tigray in discedenze Axumite culture by so many factors that can be the type of construction of rural and very similar urban dwellings, with many rural life testimonies and behaviors that differ from other Ethiopian peoples not to mention that the main cities and places of historical importance are found in Tigray.--tell me Sennaitgebremariam (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 13:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The block is for one month, but it should be considered an indefinite block for this . If the user comes back with a different IP, they should be blocked on sight until this is settled.  We take legal threats seriously, and while you have every right to take whatever legal action you choose, Wikipedia policy is to not allow threatening parties to edit while there is a potential outstanding issue.  Any admin is free to modify this block in any way without asking me, although notification after the fact is appreciated.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 13:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)