User talk:2001:569:72B5:B700:49ED:72BD:7944:130

This article is striking in how thin the discussion is, and how accountability is referred to in the quoted sections as "political correctness" and "identity politics." In fact, what these terms mask is that a dismissive attitude towards issues of social justice, speaking of them as a constraint rather than an opening up of discussion to include non-white voices. Have you interviewed any cultural studies academics, perhaps those that are also people of colour, to provide a countering view to those in the article who seem to scoff at the idea both by using these terms, and then citing the times when basically the film was shown without anyone making a complaint, as a sign that it was okay to represent this as "historical fact." Would we also present as historical fact, unmediated mentions of other references to a cruel chapter of human subjugation, normalizing it as 'the past' when we know in fact that this chapter of racial inequality is anything but over. We must hold ourselves accountable, and this article shows a bias and an academic laziness which must be addressed.