User talk:2001:62A:4:31:77:80:62:196

March 2024
Hello, I'm Geardona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Central European University without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please also see ARBPIA, and discuss on the talk page before making further edits. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Did you read my edit summary? Did you read the content you restored? 2001:62A:4:31:77:80:62:196 (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, as a matter of fact I did, I considered options regarding that for a solid minute. The content was cited to sources, that yes, were not ideal, but were supported by other sources. I encourage you to read the policy here, as I can see that this IP is registered to the university. I am going to place a little explainer here about WP:CTOPS, I encourage you to look through there, and then make a request on the talk page. Geardona (talk to me?) 18:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not interested in the political topic itself at all. My motivation was nothing political, but aesthetic. I just thought it was very ugly, first twitter is not reliable source and second they cited it with wrong citation style and it looks very ugly in the reference section. Apart from the twitter thing, mentioning these events with a large text is not propotional to the article. 2001:62A:4:31:77:80:62:196 (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are correct that Twitter/X is a generally unreliable source but if it is written by an esteemed member of the organization, it can be discussed in the talk page about the validity of the twitter/X post. Using cite web and cite twitter can both be used when citing a twitter link, it does not matter. Claiming to remove a citation because they used the wrong citation source, is not a valid reason to remove sources. I also wish for you to read Policy on Conflict of Interest.  Thecowboygilbert  -  (talk) ♥  19:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Geardona (talk to me?) 18:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)