User talk:2001:8003:1D90:9D00:4CDE:2398:7021:83E5

April 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ~  car path ian flo rist  03:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Lego Masters (Australian TV series), appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. You're correct that the Format section should not be there without references but your reason for removing it is a bit dodgy. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)