User talk:2001:8003:3303:F301:60BF:A70:C918:AB95

December 2022
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hopman Cup—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The second edit by 2001:8003:3303:F301:60BF:A70:C918:AB95 was actually constructive, with a correct, albeit slightly generic explanation ("Bad references"; the mistake in their first edit was apparently caused by this misleading reference that was talking about a different event in Brisbane, Perth and Sydney). The second reference doesn't say anything about the Hopman Cup at all, not even the archived version. It is an article about the United Cup. The first reference is a paid one, and again, the freely viewable part is talking solely about the United Cup. I don't have a subscription to verify that the paid part doesn't mention the Hopman Cup, so I left it there in my edit and removed only the second reference (someone with a subscription should check the first one and remove it if it doesn't confirm the statement in the article either). But anyway, this was surely a misunderstanding.—93.153.90.245 (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2022 (UTC)