User talk:2001:8003:4811:F501:31E6:AE57:8569:9701

October 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Judge Rotenberg Educational Center—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Judge Rotenberg Educational Center. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site, message board, advice site, advertising vehicle or tabloid. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, gossip, personal opinions, personal experiences, messages, commentary, advocacy, complaints, advice, joke edits, promotional material, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Manual of Style/Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents.

From No original research: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at Verifiability". From Verifiability: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an Citing sources to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution" and "Articles must be based on reliable, third party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Donner60 (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hydromania (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 05:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judge Rotenberg Educational Center. PrasieTheSun (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PrasieTheSun (talk) 05:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 05:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.