User talk:2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E

My defense in regards to Sockpuppet investigations/Sapah3: This is my defense. I don't make problematic edits to Wikipedia. I follow the rules. The only time I have broken the rules was by using a second account while waiting for a block to expire. That is the only time I have broken the rules on Wikipedia.

I was unfarily targeted by an IP address (who happens to live in my city) in which my privacy on Wikipedia was breached. I came to Wikipedia to edit privately, not to have my identity exposed by an IP user who knows who I am now. They didn't like how I reverted an unconstructive edit they made as an IP user and they came after me by using multiple accounts (, and ). When all of those accounts were blocked for sockpuppetry, they created a new account and successfuly got me blocked by locating my location and building a case to block me.

The thing is if you look at the edits I have made on my original account, I haven't made a single problematic edit. I always provide sources and I always engage in discussion if there is an issue. I'm not here to destroy Wikipedia. I don't tamper with edits and I don't pretend to be two different users. I only come here to make constructive edits.

In regards to my second account, I created this account because at the time, I had suspicion that the IP user would come after me in another form and somehow get me blocked. I created this account (FloralRiver}) to defend myself and get my original account back in case that ever happened. I made three initial edits using this account to test what it felt like to edit under a different "persona" per se. I should have waited until my 2 week block ended but I didn't and broke the rules as a result of that.

Yes I made a huge error by using a second account without waiting for my block to end. However, I am not problematic and my intention is to contribute positively to Wikipedia. I find it so unfortunate that my good intentions on this site have been compromised because an IP user had a problem with me in which they exposed my identity.

If there is one thing that you take from this, it's that I'm not problematic. If you look at my edits on my registered account you will see that I don't make edits to destroy this site. My good intentions on this site were compromised by an IP user who had issues with me and exposed my identity. I made one mistake, that's a fact but I would like to think that one mistake doesn't define who I am as an editor on this site. (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 02:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC))

Hi Could you please have a look at the comments I have published above and let me know what you think? Thanks. I'm not here to disrupt Wikipedia. (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 03:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC))

Firstly, the IP address, 101.165.223.2 is not my IP address. I said I was in another location, that's why it changed and I'm not going to tell you what that location is because I'm not going to ruin other people's lives. So please don't get it blocked because it's not even mine. Secondly, you reverted to edits that aren't supported by sources. You do know that you don't have to revert every edit made by a "sockpuppet" right? You reverted to information that is not supported by sources. In fact your reversion of my content has even led to a discussion to revert it back to what I established with my account earlier in the year. At this point, you're just removing all of my edits because I made them when in fairness to the Wikipedia project you shouldn't have because you have reinstated factually incorrect information that is not supported by the citations listed on the page. Yes, I read every citation before I made changes to information on articles. I read them and that's why I made those changes. Also, you reverted to a version that was made by a blocked IP user (5.187.53.56). (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC))

Message to Austronesier
Hi, long story short I was wrongly accused of being a sockpuppet by somebody who developed a grudge against me and happens to live in my city. My account and IP address have all been blocked. I've tried to explain what happened but nobody seems to be interested in listening and to be honest, I'm worn out over all of this because my privacy was breached.

I've directed this message to you today because all of my edits are being reverted and I noticed you actually started a discussion to change the name of Sri Lankan Creole Malay to "Sri Lanka Malay language". I actually changed the name of that page to "Sri Lankan Malay language" due to its prevalence in Google Scholar. As you have noticed, it was reverted yesterday because I made the edit. So I thought I'd bring your attention to a page I created that is now going to be deleted (Category:Sri Lankan people of Malay descent). I created this page before I was blocked but for some reason it's going to be deleted even though that's against the rules. I'm not asking you dispute the deletion tag but I thought I'd just bring your attention to it just in case you're interested because you make a lot of edits to Austronesian-related pages on Wikipedia. Okay, that's all. Thanks for reading. (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 14:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC))
 * I've retracted this because it's actually canvassing, please ignore this message Austronesier. (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC))
 * You do realize what you're attempting is inappropriate canvassing, right? Not to mention your continued bludgeoning on your own talk page, how do you expect admins to even give you a chance? Liberaldemocrat (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , okay I've just realised that what I've done is canvassing. Clearly I need to re-familiarise myself with name change etc. discussion rules. As for the "bludgeoning" comment, well I tried to defend myself at the investigation page but nobody read what I posted. I don't think I've had the proper opportunity to explain my side of the story. I wasn't even notified by the IP user when they reported me that there was an investigation involving me. I had no idea I was blocked until I logged in. I had no opportunity to defend myself against their claims. So yes I'm continuing to bludgeon because I don't think anybody can hear me. (2001:8003:5C00:1A00:5055:3EE0:FB34:5A4E (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC))