User talk:2001:8003:D436:BB00:90E3:8230:6A1C:6C7D

I don't understand why, if you see fit to mention that Iacocca was the "driving force" behind the Pinto, the following points aren't relevant: 1) The car's massive safety issues resulting in fire 2) The internal memo with cost-benefit analysis of lives Vs recall costs (which resulted in a decision against the recall) 3) Iacocca's firing 1 month after recall (which was eventually done due to litigation costs potentially far exceeding their cost-benefit analysis) 4) The huge damage to Ford's reputation