User talk:2001:8004:1400:4E6C:3D07:CA95:EDD1:FD9E

Unblock Request

 * The reason given for the block doesn't seem to relate to what you say, so your understanding of the reason for the block may be mistaken. I can't see any record of anyone who has edited the article Ian Darling declaring a conflict of interest, but I do see a single-purpose account which looks very much as though it has an undisclosed conflict of interest. Presumably you have in mind other articles connected to him.
 * this is a CheckUser block which you imposed. Can you have a look at it? JBW (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @JBW: I looked again and stand behind my CU block. There are too many sockmasters in this range. If the OP would like to edit, they can request an account -- Guerillero  Parlez Moi 09:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * After I declined the above unblock request, I realised that the block on this IP range does not in fact date from 04:38, 20 May 2022. With some searching I managed to find the one and only block which was made at that time. It was a block on an account which had posted blatant spam, written in such a manner that it is virtually certain that it was written by a marketing professional, certainly with the intention of promotion, which makes nonsense of what you wrote above. Also, that account's editing had no connection whatever to Ian Darling, which suggests that you confused together two different and unrelated bits of promotional editing by your business. JBW (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)