User talk:2001:861:E3C3:7F60:DD6E:FB81:6543:D3FD

June 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mauritania. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 19:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from trying to add some irrelevant POV to the Mauritania article. If it was just a case of sources and given your initial edit, then there are plenty that can be added to support what you certainly wouldn't want to see. M.Bitton (talk) 19:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * According to the UN the Sahara is a disputed territory it is not vandalism but a fact and here is the proof https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt
 * stop your censorship and who are you to dictate what is relevant or not? 2001:861:E3C3:7F60:DD6E:FB81:6543:D3FD (talk) 19:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's not about censorship, it's about you trying to inject some political POV into the lead of article that has nothing to do with the subject. M.Bitton (talk) 19:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It is not an POV, but it is important to note that according to the UN the Sahara is a disputed territory between Morocco and the Polisario (https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt) to understand the regional tensions in which Mauritania lives 2001:861:E3C3:7F60:E876:8989:6FCB:F938 (talk) 20:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * First, that's a very poor excuse to inject your political POV into the article (your first edit says everything there is to know about what you want to achieve). Second, the word "disputed" doesn't appear anywhere in that source, and besides, Western Sahara has nothing to do with Mauritania (the primary subject). Please refrain from edit warring and seek consensus for your changes (per the WP:ONUS policy). M.Bitton (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)