User talk:2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E

November 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * You seem to have missed the word "reliable" in my comment. Fringe sources such as "wisconsinrightnow.com" do not qualify. The BLP policy has been linked to you repeatedly, and you seem persistent in ignoring it. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Then why not tell me that this source doesn't qualify? It's not like there wouldn't be dozens of sources that reported about it. And hwy block for BLP if RS is your issue? I honestly don't understand you. You know, i am not paid by a SuperPac to edit wikipedia in their favor like you, so i wouldn't know.2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:RS, which has already been linked. This "news outfit" has no apparent editorial board, and the shoddily put-together website (note the "Contact us: contact@yoursite.com" at the bottom) is typical of content farms.
 * Casting unfounded aspersions, such as that I am "paid by a SuperPac", is not likely to help your cause, by the way. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You didn't address any of my points. Is it business as usual to ban for RS. For something that i can give you 10 other sources for if you just ask for it, which you did not do? And then why block for BLP? Don't forget to assume good faith, dear SuperPAC employee 2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The BLP policy is quite clear that any contentious claims about living or recently deceased people must be supported by reliable sources. I blocked because of your repeated failure to do this, after the BLP policy was explained to you. Feel free to sit out the block or request unblock from another admin, the choice is up to you, but my discussion here is done. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * As a note to any admin who may decide to consider an unblock request, please note the apparent block evasion: Special:Contribs/213.142.96.135. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you're able to find 10 high quality clearly reliable secondary sources then please do so. I don't know why you're adding absolute junk like the source discussed above, followed by a clear WP:BLPPRIMARY violation on this talk page after you were blocked when there are supposedly so many quality sources. If you still haven't read the whole BLP policy then please do so since you clearly need to familiarise yourself with it. Nil Einne (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * There were sources linked here on the talkpage and removed. One was a direct link to the criminal records on a government page. There are multiple other sources, which includes also CNN and even snopes, in the BLP discussion about it. All reliable sources have been presented. And you yourself could have found them if you would have bothered with investing even the lowest amount of effort. It would have taken you less time than it too you to write this comment. Remember to Assume good Faith 2001:871:237:58FB:35D8:81C4:D7CE:D601 (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)