User talk:2001:8F8:172D:EB5C:143A:6D9A:A149:F04A

October 2020
Hello, I'm Alexandermcnabb. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Abu Dhabi that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I just made minor changes I don't understand what is your problem, I need to figure out a way how to block you from editing. You are a terrible user, why the hell should I respect you?! --2001:8F8:172D:EB5C:143A:6D9A:A149:F04A (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, they were minor but they were also incorrect. If you want to change content in some way that goes against the stable content of an article, you'll need to provide sources for the novel information. You don't have a source, you're just banging in something that you THINK is correct but in fact is not correct. The sentence in question refers to "maximum temperatures averaging above 41" and if you look at the chart, MAXIMUM temperatures do indeed average above 41. This type of edit is typically characterised as 'NOR' or No Original Research- see WP:NOR. To summarise it all - something you think you know is not good enough to change facts in Wikipedia, you need to find a reliable, published source for the change. That apart, you were also quite rude from the get-go, which doesn't tend you go down well in normal human discourse. You know, that whole 'good morning you fucking dick-head' approach tends not to win friends and influence people? So you've been reverted, been rude, have been given an opportunity to reflect on the fact that a) you were wrong b) your approach to this whole thing was at best ignorant and now you're heading for being blocked by an administrator for incivility and persistent OR edits. Perhaps take a step back, ask yourself if it's really that important to you, take a deep breath and have another go at doing something more constructive on Wikipedia??? If you want to have me blocked from editing, you can always complain about me at WP:AN - the administrator's noticeboard, but I'd honestly have a wee think about your own conduct first. Stay safe - Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the graph again, June's maximum is 40.8, and September is 40.4, Are you lying to me right now? I mean do they look "averaging above 41°C" to you?! That's one of the reasons I changed it to "averaging above 40°C" which makes more sense, and I don't require any source because June's and September's MAXIMUM temperatures averaging LESS THAN 41°C according to the chart. If there is any source saying otherwise, why don't YOU provide them instead and update the table?. Secondly, I believe all of the information that you have just said is incorrect. This is one of the factors I tend to lose disrespect towards you. 2001:8F8:172D:EB5C:143A:6D9A:A149:F04A (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)