User talk:2001:A61:345C:3601:781E:CAF2:905D:8D48

November 2022
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Amethystine python—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, I have checked the indicated sources for the maximum size of the snake and found that they did not mention any scientifically verified records of amethystine pythons reaching lengths of over 6 meters, let alone 9 meters. The max. weight of the largest individuals also seems to be around 30 kg tops, instead of the 90-91 kg, as the article mentions. Which makes sense, because the amethystine python has a much more slender build than the tiger python or the anaconda, so if it reaches around the same lengths as those two, it is likley to be much lighter than they are. 2001:A61:345C:3601:781E:CAF2:905D:8D48 (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)