User talk:2001:F40:908:D7C9:9471:743F:C70A:8008

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2020 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.  Ts12rAc talk to me 17:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Ts12rAc talk to me 18:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

I have added the citations to the contents. They are not original and are verifiable. For those who think that the section on Chinese Taipei for the parade of nations is unnecessary - please consider that for purposes of fairness and impartiality there shall be no sidelining of information. This is a section specifically on the parade of nations during the Tokyo 2020 opening ceremony and is a section to explain how the organisers arrive at the sequence of entry that the world saw. For most nations it is merely based on their official country name and there =fore nothing to speak about. However, for the Chinese Taipei sequence of entry, as you will note, this is not strictly by any convention. The convention to separate the Chinese Taipei and China teams was because in most instances, the script order based on most languages of previous host countries would mean that the two teams will inevitably make their appearance one after another. However, that convention does not apply here as under Japanese script order, the two teams will in any case not appear one right after another. It is therefore necessary to make lengthy explanation or those who are less superficial (i.e. those who actually pay attention to details) will find it hard to comprehend why the Chinese Taipei team did not enter between 106th and 108th as they should have. There is nothing much to talk about the order of most other nations, and for USA and France, they could be simply summarised as a one liner and still be comprehensible. Therefore it is unfair to judge this paragraph merely by its length. And although it may relate to a sensitive topic, nothing is talked about the motivation behind this arrangement. Therefore it is an impartial and fair account of the events. If such fair account of what happened, which is directly relevant to this sub-heading explaining the parade order, cannot be included for reasons of sensitivity, then wikipedia pages on all sino-taiwan relations shall also be removed.

Stop spamming controversial discussion about Taiwan
… without discussion on the right page.--Arorae (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * DO NOT REPLY on my page but on PARADE page, please,--Arorae (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Participation In Edit War
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 2020 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. VarietyEditor (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.