User talk:2003:D8:8BC2:1800:AD50:FBF8:22E4:5882

October 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Symphony No. 6 (Vaughan Williams) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Symphony No. 6 (Vaughan Williams) was changed by 2003:D8:8BC2:1800:AD50:FBF8:22E4:5882 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958639 on 2018-10-08T14:38:09+00:00

Your recent editing history at Symphony No. 6 (Vaughan Williams) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Hey--I understand you have something to add to the article, but you're not going about it the right way. What you're doing is edit warring and that's always a bad thing even if you are right. In this case you're not right, since the formatting of your information doesn't follow Wikipedia's guidelines and the rest of the article--for starters. So, please seek the talk page and discuss, because if you continue like this you will be blocked, most likely. '' Drmies (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.