User talk:2005can

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first pages you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that page.

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you've had a new article rejected or deleted, new article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE  and on IRC chatAgain, welcome! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

rename
done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You're awesome, thank you so much! 2005can (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Failed to carry over:2023-09-08T12:42:23 Deepfriedokra talk contribs globally renamed Canadarail to 2005can -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Rocky Mountaineer
It's spam cited to the website that is the same name as your previous user name. Also, the edit summary is the standard boilerplate used by spammers. You might want to self revert. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC) Wrong. But still spammy, source.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I see you are around. Third opinion please on this edit, bearing mind that the website name is the same as user's former user name. (wrong) Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for getting another opinion on this. I just want to clarify that my previous name was one of my passions. I hastily created a username without much thought not realizing is would mean my edits would be marked as spam and removed - I realized quite soon after I created it might be in violation (which is why I asked you to change). My past username is not the name of the website I suggested - please double check and you will see. As a new user, I appreciate you being wary, but rest assured, I plan on contributing more. I just started with a few obvious quick fixes. The website I linked to I believe is the only accredited specialist and contains current information on the topic. The service I added is a new service introduced in 2021. If my edits are going to be marked as spam and removed each time, I feel this is all counterproductive for all parties. The said page is long overdue for an update. Thanks again for your consideration. 2005can (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2023 (UTC)