User talk:2006nishan178713/Archive 2

A belated welcome
 Hello, 2006nishan178713, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Additional tips...
 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you need any other help, leave me a message on my talk page.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for helping. Partha Basak 14:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natural resources of Bhutan
Hello 2006nishan178713,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Natural resources of Bhutan for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DanCherek (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Probably yes User:2006nishan178713 15:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please do not review your own articles that are flagged in CopyPatrol, and don't copy material from other websites into Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 15:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

I have blocked you as the result of the above section; the article was mostly unedited sections of https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-natural-resources-of-bhutan.html. I previously warned you about 8 different copyright violations and said "Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing". If you want to be unblocked, you will have to demonstrate a better understanding of copyright and an understanding not to copy from sources. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I am really sorry. I underestimated copyright violations. I promise I would never do it again. I have now gone through WP:COPYRIGHT and have understood it. I realized my problem by reading WP:COPYOTHERS.
 * Please give another chance to correct myself.
 * Thanks. User:2006nishan178713 16:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this appeal might end up being declined. It would probably help you if you were a little more specific with what you would do different, and how you would specifically avoid instances where you copied in something word for word. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he wants another chance, give him that chance. WP:ROPE? Declining unblocks isn't helpful. Maybe this thing will solve everything for him. Earwig's Copyvio Detector. It surely did for me.:)--Filmomusico (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What is particularly troubling, even more so than the copyright violations themselves, was that 2006nishan178713 appeared to notice that a bot had flagged their article for potential copyvio, logged into the copyright patrolling interface, and marked their own article as "no action needed", which seems like a clear attempt to evade scrutiny. I agree with ToBeFree's advice. DanCherek (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you provide prove of that? I don't know how it works on deleted articles.--Filmomusico (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is my first time doing this kind of mistake. I had intentionally reviewed my article which I am really sorry for. Please give me a single chance to correct myself, I promise I would never do it again. And if I do, administrators are free to block me permanently. Please!
 * Good Day! User:2006nishan178713 18:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess, stuff happens. We all need to assume good faith of the editor and give him rope.--Filmomusico (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is, the user did have multiple second chances already. The initial warning about multiple copyright violations by Moneytrees was a second chance offer. Five days later, Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission was created with copied content. I have noticed and highlighted this issue using "mark" HTML tags (usually a yellow background) at "Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission" after a request for feedback. The issue was addressed by 2006nishan178713 on the same day. Five further days later, Natural resources of Bhutan was copy-pasted together from Britannica and World Atlas. If it was an intentional attempt of deception, the trust is currently too broken for an unblock. If it was an accident, the competence is currently too low for an unblock. This is not "stuff happens", this is "some people should currently not edit Wikipedia". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he is blocked indefinitely how will he prove that his edit habbits have changed in say a month or so?--Filmomusico (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , As described in the decline explanation, we assume that people can learn and change over time. 2006nishan178713 has proven that 10 days were not enough time for this process to happen, yet requests an unblock less than 60 minutes after the block notification, and less than half a day after the previous decline. An often-used, tried-and-tested approach is the "standard offer", which proposes 6 months. It does not have to be 6 months in this case here, but certainly more than a day or two. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well ok, lets say he will issue an unblock request in 2 day time, will you assume good faith? I personally believe that an oversight will be required for any future edits by this editor. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The unblock request is still active. Please unblock me. I would never do it again, as stated earlier User:2006nishan178713 18:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Believe in me, I will never do this kind of things again.
 * I would be happy to get an oversight by someone who could monitor my edits User:2006nishan178713 11:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I am leaving Wikipedia as of now. User:2006nishan178713 05:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * You've had your "single chance" multiple times, as described above. I'm starting to repeat myself. While you're waiting, please inform yourself about the difference between a block and a ban. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Question for administrator
Please review my unblock request--User:2006nishan178713 14:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Your request is open and visible to administrators. Further requests will not speed up the process. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Head of Departments
Hi, I happened to be reading a help page archive and I saw this: "names of the "Head of Departments (HOD)" of the subjects taught in ABN Seal College" where you asked about putting the names into an article.

I'm "just" another editor, but in my opinion, information like that can get out of date after a while. Will you update the article each time there is a change? For the next 20 years or so?

I don't want to sound discouraging, but among the 6 million articles at Wikipedia, many of them likely have information that was correct when it was added... but some people lose interest, or drift away, and information like that gradually "becomes wrong". If a reader really wants info like that, the college's own web site is a much better place for them to look, and in my opinion, it doesn't need to be in the WP article.

Just something to think about. Thanks. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 05:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * True Indeed 2006nishan178713 05:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission
Hmm--after all the copy edits I had to make, I run into a phrase that in your first version was unverified--look for "spirited". Turns out, it's from the Wired article. You created that article on 5 November 2021, a few days before your block. You know, you could have helped your case by indicating where and when you had committed those infractions. Drmies (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * As mentioned before, I didn't know clearly about the copyright policies here. I totally forgot about that case you have mentioned above. Anyways, I am getting some experience by contributing to Wikinews and Wikivoyage. Regards! 2006nishan178713t@lk 04:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay! It was a translation from hindi to english 2006nishan178713t@lk 16:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)