User talk:2006nishan178713/Main Archive 1

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Welcome 2006nishan178713! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,705,466 registered editors!

Hello 2006nishan178713. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely,  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 16:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)    [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Triggered Insaan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Triggered Insaan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 11:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Triggered Insaan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Triggered Insaan. Thanks!  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  18:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Triggered Insaan (October 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Triggered Insaan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Triggered Insaan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Triggered_Insaan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Triggered_Insaan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dantak has been accepted
 Dantak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Dantak help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Appreciate it! Thanks for reviewing and approving my first article. :) Partha Basak 15:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Nuno Mendes (footballer, born 2002)
Good afternoon,

i'm actually reverting banned sock User:Martimc123, i've been here for 15 years so i know what i'm doing. This guy has dozens of IPs, has received tons of warnings as here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:193.136.189.3 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:46.50.0.250).

Thanks for your help and understanding, i have already reported this. Have a nice evening. --2001:8A0:7667:5801:3C53:4F0:9805:F8BC (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep up the good work Partha Basak 19:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Partha Basak 20:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Updates: you were indeed correct to revert me here, and also in Diogo Costa. Some vandals often use misleading summaries to avoid scrutiny/reversion, so one never knows so to speak. But hey, no need to worry about me anymore, i'm leaving WP as of now.

All the best here and outside of here, goodbye! --2001:8A0:7667:5801:682D:479C:11D4:8124 (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism warning signatures
Hey! Thanks for your reverts of that annoying IP vandal over at James Lyng High School. Just wanted to remind you that per the policy on signatures you should sign your warning templates. It would be pretty disconcerting for a new user making test edits who barely knows a talk page exists to get a boilerplate template message out of the blue with no signature attached for them to respond to. Not that the person in this case was, of course, making test edits but it could happen in the future so keep signing in mind. Thank you!  always forever  (talk) 05:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reminding Partha Basak 06:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Dj Snæk. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. '' You are not an administrator, and are not able to block users. Is there some reason you left a block template on this editor's talkpage?'' Jack Frost (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but the user was performing unexplained section blanking without proper edit summaries. He seemed to claim authority of the article by using the edit summary "Corrected illegal information, fraud attempt, copywriting infringement protection most importantly. The truth. Visual improvements. Will be modding the page daily" in one of his previous edits. Partha Basak 05:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Regardless of how disruptive a user is, don't leave a block notice unless you can actually block them; it's not appropriate and it confuses things. If you're worried about their behaviour, warn them or report them. Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 05:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out my mistake, I will take care of it from now. Have a good day. Partha Basak 05:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * How many times a day do you get told to stop abusing twinkle templates?176.204.114.31 (talk) 06:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * this is the first time. Partha Basak 07:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please stop harassing other users. Editors can also make mistakes. People like you disrupt the friendly environment of Wikipedia. You are not even experienced. Please read Wikipedia policies and the Manual of Style before editing. Partha Basak 18:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Removing warnings is fine
Hi, removing messages (including warnings) from one's own talk page is fine. See WP:UP for details. In a nutshell, please interpret such removal as a read receipt, not as an assumption of bad faith and especially not as an attack. If someone has clearly requested not to receive further messages yet edits disruptively after a warning, it is often recommendable to start a discussion at WP:ANI about the issue. When you do so, please provide specific evidence (diff links) of the disruptive behavior you're complaining about. Merely disagreeing with you about the content of an article, and even disagreeing about the helpfulness of your Twinkle usage, is not vandalism nor necessarily problematic. When in doubt, disengage from the conflict rather than putting fuel on the fire. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * thanks for your suggestions. Partha Basak 19:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * By the way, you play great piano Partha Basak 19:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries, and thank you :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome
 Hello, 2006nishan178713, and Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Additional tips...
 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you need any other help, leave me a message on my talk page.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for helping. Partha Basak 14:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natural resources of Bhutan
Hello 2006nishan178713,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Natural resources of Bhutan for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DanCherek (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Probably yes User:2006nishan178713 15:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please do not review your own articles that are flagged in CopyPatrol, and don't copy material from other websites into Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 15:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

I have blocked you as the result of the above section; the article was mostly unedited sections of https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-natural-resources-of-bhutan.html. I previously warned you about 8 different copyright violations and said "Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing". If you want to be unblocked, you will have to demonstrate a better understanding of copyright and an understanding not to copy from sources. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 16:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I am really sorry. I underestimated copyright violations. I promise I would never do it again. I have now gone through WP:COPYRIGHT and have understood it. I realized my problem by reading WP:COPYOTHERS.
 * Please give another chance to correct myself.
 * Thanks. User:2006nishan178713 16:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this appeal might end up being declined. It would probably help you if you were a little more specific with what you would do different, and how you would specifically avoid instances where you copied in something word for word. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 17:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he wants another chance, give him that chance. WP:ROPE? Declining unblocks isn't helpful. Maybe this thing will solve everything for him. Earwig's Copyvio Detector. It surely did for me.:)--Filmomusico (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What is particularly troubling, even more so than the copyright violations themselves, was that 2006nishan178713 appeared to notice that a bot had flagged their article for potential copyvio, logged into the copyright patrolling interface, and marked their own article as "no action needed", which seems like a clear attempt to evade scrutiny. I agree with ToBeFree's advice. DanCherek (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you provide prove of that? I don't know how it works on deleted articles.--Filmomusico (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is my first time doing this kind of mistake. I had intentionally reviewed my article which I am really sorry for. Please give me a single chance to correct myself, I promise I would never do it again. And if I do, administrators are free to block me permanently. Please!
 * Good Day! User:2006nishan178713 18:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess, stuff happens. We all need to assume good faith of the editor and give him rope.--Filmomusico (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is, the user did have multiple second chances already. The initial warning about multiple copyright violations by Moneytrees was a second chance offer. Five days later, Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission was created with copied content. I have noticed and highlighted this issue using "mark" HTML tags (usually a yellow background) at "Nanda Devi Plutonium Mission" after a request for feedback. The issue was addressed by 2006nishan178713 on the same day. Five further days later, Natural resources of Bhutan was copy-pasted together from Britannica and World Atlas. If it was an intentional attempt of deception, the trust is currently too broken for an unblock. If it was an accident, the competence is currently too low for an unblock. This is not "stuff happens", this is "some people should currently not edit Wikipedia". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If he is blocked indefinitely how will he prove that his edit habbits have changed in say a month or so?--Filmomusico (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , As described in the decline explanation, we assume that people can learn and change over time. 2006nishan178713 has proven that 10 days were not enough time for this process to happen, yet requests an unblock less than 60 minutes after the block notification, and less than half a day after the previous decline. An often-used, tried-and-tested approach is the "standard offer", which proposes 6 months. It does not have to be 6 months in this case here, but certainly more than a day or two. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well ok, lets say he will issue an unblock request in 2 day time, will you assume good faith? I personally believe that an oversight will be required for any future edits by this editor. :)--Filmomusico (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The unblock request is still active. Please unblock me. I would never do it again, as stated earlier User:2006nishan178713 18:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Believe in me, I will never do this kind of things again.
 * I would be happy to get an oversight by someone who could monitor my edits User:2006nishan178713 11:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I am leaving Wikipedia as of now. User:2006nishan178713 05:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * You've had your "single chance" multiple times, as described above. I'm starting to repeat myself. While you're waiting, please inform yourself about the difference between a block and a ban. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Question for administrator
Please review my unblock request--User:2006nishan178713 14:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Your request is open and visible to administrators. Further requests will not speed up the process. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)