User talk:201.142.197.117

June 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Constellation Brands, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.  When removing referenced content, you need to explain either (1) why the source cited is unreliable, (2) how the information is inaccurate. Meticulo (talk) 10:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Constellation Brands. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

  Meticulo (talk) 10:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi. For the IMTA pdf which you cited in this edit summary, can you give us a page number, please? Preferably also which paragraphs you say support your edit. I'm not willing to to paste 29 pages into Google Translate. Thanks. Meticulo (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)