User talk:201/Archive 01

Linking heading reply
I would still say keep it like this for now because:
 * 1) This is a list page, using would make this long page unnecessarily longer
 * 2) I am keeping in format with the List of secondary characters from Futurama page
 * -th1rt3en 19:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The Futurama page could be wrong, however the guidelines are guidelines and not rules. See Wikipedia is not..., Wikipedia on consensus, and Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. -th1rt3en 20:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. - Daishokaioshin 20:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I didn't know about the attack thing. But about your mistaken conception of vandalism I'm as sure as it gets, read your own link.--201 20:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: huh?
Whether you created the tables or not is irrelevant. They are not "yours", they are Wikipedia's. The edits you have been making are not constructive or necessary, and repeatedly making them IS considered vandalism by Wikipedia's standards. Please refrain from reverting things anymore and consider that the other editors do not agree with your changes for a reason, and are not just reverting your changes to be jerks.

Daishokaioshin 20:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

You barely know what you're talking about, read your own links, brainiac.--201 20:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Perhaps we should organize the categories in the article alphabetically, and not worry about race or saga? And please stop the personal attacks.


 * Daishokaioshin 20:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * As for the vandalism thing, I was just using a template because I saw someone warn you about vandalism, and you continued to make the same edits. It was a level one warning, and while it should be taken seriously, was not meant to insult or irritate you, merely to make you aware that what you were doing was not being viewed by other contributors as helping the article. My apologies if it bothered you.


 * Daishokaioshin 20:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it did. Be more careful in the future. Prior to you there was only one disagreement with my view, and you didn't specify you pocition before your warning.--201 21:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * According to Akira Toriyama, and Dragon Ball canon, Tenshinhan and Choutzu are both human beings. Choutzu is just small, and Tenshinhan has a third eye to represent the fact he is "enlightened". Neither of them is a monster or non-human, and thus fit just fine in the human categories. It's a common misconception that anything that doesn't look human according to our own standards has to be non-human. But a Saiyajin without a tail looks human, and isn't, and the addition of a third eye doesn't equate to not being human, because as far as I know, Tenshihan wasn't born with his third eye, he acquired it through training.


 * Daishokaioshin 21:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I took off the vandalism warning since those actions are not considered vandalism by the vandalim article. How ever I do regret the attack and feel ashamed about it, so I'm keeping the other warning.--201 02:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Painting
Ok, I'll try doing templates. For now, Im doing the design of the templates. Good luck to us! Hedwig0407 02:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Can please tell me what templates we will need for the wikiproject? Hedwig0407 07:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Akane Kimidori.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Akane Kimidori.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Middle-earth WikiProject!
Hello, !

Thank you for joining WikiProject Middle-earth and contributing to improve Tolkien-related articles. We are glad to have you join in the effort!

Here're some good links and subpages related to our WikiProject.


 * Middle-earth WikiProject discussion
 * Middle-earth WikiProject things to do - A compilation of all the tasks that are needed to do
 * Middle-earth Standards (talk)
 * Middle-earth WikiProject Portal

If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to ask on our talk page.

Thank you for your contributions and have fun editing! — Mir  l   e   n   01:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:
''Howcome only Lex Luthor gets his own (Smallville) article and Clark and Lana don't?--201 03:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC) ''

Making seperate pages is damn hard. I've only done it once, and for all my work, I was rewarded by a wikipedia "cleanup" message. Nice.

Plus I hate Lana. She is the worst character and she acts like she has mental herpes simplex. If you think more Smallville characters need seperate pages, make it yourself. Actually the only reason they haven't been made already is because its hard to upload good images without some trigger-happy admin deleting them because the source URL is "not a valid source for images". ==User:Johnnyfog 12:49, 10.4.06

Smallville
First of all I suggest you discuss the creation of a template for Smallville's characters with other users in Talk:Smallville (TV series). You might find others interested in taking part of the process. I see you are a new user, but surprisingly already familiarized with Wikipedia. So I think you can do it yourselves based on Template:24 characters and Template:Alias characters. Regards and good luck! —Lesfer (t/c/@) 16:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is amazing how familiar with Wikipedia you are. --Chris Griswold (  ☎  ☓  ) 16:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I've been practicing a lot.--201 18:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess so. I see you're a member of a number of WikiProjects. --Chris Griswold (  ☎  ☓  ) 18:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

hahaha. I got crazy with the projects some days ago. I don't think I'll be abble to take the pressure, though, maybe I should quit some (or most) --201 18:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

I proposed the same thing to all, some digged them, some didn't. Comics is impressively active, I don't think I could be usefull there. I think you guys already set your formats and know what you want. Other projects, specially Painting, are just taking their first steps. Is there something like a wikiproject: wikiprojects? --201 19:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is. --Chris Griswold (  ☎  ☓  ) 20:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Maybe they should decide, because I think some WP accepted the infobox with no problems. But I'm starting to realize it might be against oficial formats or something. I'm realizing some users that strongly disagree with the idea uf using such infoboxes have been around way before me. Maybe wikiprojects are suposed to be for more experimented users, I feel like small fish among sharks and whales.

Lately, I don't even feel qualified to edit wikipedia, everybody knows the rules, policies and formats but me. All I can do is copypaste and change the info a bit. I've been told not to write, because my spelling made an article look messy, I tried with organizing always using similar articles as templates, but they always tell me there are always policies and agreements I ignore.--201 01:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)