User talk:201/Chris' Comment

Archiving
There are better ways to handle your situation than create multiple sock puppets. And don't say this is the only time. You've failed checkuser three times with multiple accounts. So you continue to break the rules.

As for why other editors weren't following you, that's because this time you stuck to subjects tangentially related to your previous ones. And even despite that, we all knew within days because we all have fingers in the subject areas you'll edit, and we recognize you no matter what sock puppet you're using. And we were watching you, figuring out how best to approach the situation and how to clean up once it was over.

Wikipedians have to contend enough with people adding fake information to the site; we don't need editors who are fake themselves.

Again, I beseech you: Focus on something else. Work on your art, find another wiki if you have to. Check out Wikia, for instance. Make no miastake: I think you're a decent person, but you had trouble getting along with others here and accepting the way Wikipedia works. T-man/The Judge/Shredderman/201, you've chosen to break pretty big rules, and you have to accept the consequences. --Chris Griswold ( ☎  ☓  ) 21:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

As for the reverts of your work, you have been told before that that is what happens when a banned editor falsely edits Wikipedia. From my standpoint, if you're lying about who you are, and your behavior is only slightly better because you're trying to hide, how are to trust your edits? Finally, the actions that we have performed, we have performed because that is what is needed to be done. Steve has other stuff to worry about, and so we pitch in. Administrators are not needed for the tasks we're doing. I hear this "rollback" thing is awesome for it, though. --Chris Griswold ( ☎  ☓  ) 21:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)