User talk:2019Research

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (January 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:European Review of Aging and Physical Activity may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:2019Research Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:2019Research reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hi! I've deleted Draft:European Review of Aging and Physical Activity because it was copied with minimal changes from this page, which carries a clear notice "© Springer Nature Switzerland AG". I've also deleted User:2019Research/sandbox for exactly the same reason. You can create a new version of the draft if you wish, but it must be written entirely in your own words – except, of course, for proper names. Since you are a Springer employee, you'll need to make a proper paid-editor disclosure, ideally both on the talk-page of the draft and on your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. You should do that before making any further edit relating to Springer products or publications. Please ask (here is fine) if you have any questions. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Contested deletion
Hi, If I include the 'paid' notice in my profile and article with the same text as before will it be accepted? The text in the other BMC wiki pages have a similar company available promo text we use. Kind regards Adam

Speedy deletion nomination of European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
Hello 2019Research,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged European Review of Aging and Physical Activity for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Natureium (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, This is the same/similar content used as our other journal from BMC i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trials_(journal) We have amended the content several times so it is not similar to what is already online in the cited Spiringer and BMC pages. Can you please keep this page up as we need this for the Editor in Chief. It is more of a About Us (our journal) then promotion. Kind regards Adam

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, 2019Research. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, My User page has this tag though, there's no conflict of interest.

$ 2019Research, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by BioMed_Central for their contributions to Wikipedia.

As stated in my example, it is no different to the Trials page.

We have followed all guidelines set out by Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Adam


 * You're not getting this. The fact that you have declared your interest doesn't make it okay to try to use Wikipedia to try to promote your product. It is different from the article on Trials because that one has been written with at least some pretence at neutrality. However, it was created ten years ago and would not pass muster if it were submitted now because of the poor referencing. Wikipedia is not a web host, nor a directory. All topics must be written about from a neutral point of view and must meet standards of notability, which must be independently verifiable. Deb (talk) 16:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2019Research/Adam, you've made a paid-editor disclosure, just as I asked – thank you for that! However, that doesn't mean that you can ignore our conflict-of-interest guidelines, and it doesn't mean that you can promote Springer products or publications here – Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion of any kind. For reasons that I personally have never been able to understand, paid editors may create pages in draft space (i.e., the page title starts with "Draft:"), as long as they make a proper disclosure. They are strongly discouraged from editing in article space on any topic where they have a COI; very often that "discouragement" takes the form of immediate deletion or reversion of their edits. Please read the various links that Deb and I have left you. If you have questions, please ask here. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)