User talk:202.0.189.94

Lawrence B. Jones
I reverted your removal of content sourced to the Washington Post from the lead section of this article. If you feel it should not be there please discuss on the article talk page. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 11:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Snopes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 07:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Joe Scarborough, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:32, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Karine Jean-Pierre, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 13:25, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nina Jankowicz. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 09:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Your recent editing history at No Nut November shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)