User talk:202.156.6.54

But I can't create an account. When I try and create an account, it won't let me. I get an error. That account creation has been temporarily restricted or something like that. --202.156.6.54 09:32, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Try it now. ➨  ЯEDVERS  09:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
 * The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
 * The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
 * The ability to start new pages.
 * The ability to rename pages.
 * The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
 * The ability to upload images.
 * The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
 * The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
 * Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which will let others know who left it. - Mailer Diablo 14:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ganesha on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mbimmler 17:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Candirú, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. K O S |  talk  08:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Japanese name ordering
Thank you for your contribution to Bleach (manga), but it has been reverted. It is the convention of Wikipedia to list modern Japanese names in the western order, with the given name first, followed by the family name. –Gunslinger47 19:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 15 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 07:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Typo
I noticed that the box at the top of this user page spells 'collateral' as something like 'colatertal'. I would edit it, but it is nothing but a or something like that in the editing screen. As I have no idea how to change this sort of things, can somebody please address this problem? Thanks! 202.156.6.54 08:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * This has been fixed. Thanks to whoever fixed it! 202.156.6.54 10:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, right, er you're welcome. --talk to JD wants e-mail 10:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Kamen Rider (franchise). It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 08:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mahatma Gandhi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 09:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Jamie Lim. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Konman72 09:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 15 2006 (UTC) to MapleStory
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. talk to JD wants e-mail 10:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Stamford Raffles
Your recent edit to Stamford Raffles (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Draicone (talk) 11:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hwa Chong Institution, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball,Baby!  balls  •  strikes  12:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to New Creation Church (Singapore), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Talk:New Creation Church (Singapore), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Daniel Olsen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Daniel Olsen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User talk:Daniel Olsen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 19:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Insolation
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Internet Explorer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 05:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Microsoft Windows, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 05:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Active Directory, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 05:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to DirectX, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 05:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Windows Server 2003, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 05:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Windows Me, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 05:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Steve Ballmer, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 05:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 06:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Solar system on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 07:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Confucianism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Meeples 07:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Windows Live, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 08:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

48h
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. abakharev 08:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Play with Fire (song)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. Extraordinary Machine 18:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Microsoft Office Live, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 05:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Windows 3.1x, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 05:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 18 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Luna Santin 06:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Chris (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Some P. E rson 14:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Windows 98. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  Srose  (talk)  14:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You are not accomplishing anything
You are not hurting Microsoft in any way with your repeated vandalism. You are just making a lot of work for the volunteers who try to maintain Wikipedia. Fan-1967 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You're not letting people know anything. You're just wasting people's time. You could try to come up with constructive, well-researched facts, but I guess that's not as much fun as just putting dollar signs into the name. Fan-1967 14:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, I've been blocked. I'll be back tomorrow night. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that millions read daily. It should at least try to inform users so they don't get cheated.

Signed, the cousin of the poster on the Village Pump Misc they didn't believe.


 * You haven't "informed" anybody of anything. Replacing "s" with "$" doesn't "inform". Since none of your edits stay in place longer than a minute, you're just wasting time for everyone. Fan-1967 14:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

If people see all the dollar signs they will know Wikipedia is no fan of Microsoft's evil methods of making money by cheating others with inferior software and destroying competitors.

If you are one of the people who actually writes Wikipedia, I suggest you add information to the Microsoft article, about how they have cheated people. I know many people have their edits reverted quickly, so I'm not going to bother spending lots of time on edits which will be reverted quickly. My method is fast and effecient - it just takes me a few minutes, and by hitting 20 pages, by the time someone reverts everything, there'll be some passing readers who will see my work and see how Microsoft cheats people.

I'm going to check with SingNet whether they offer shared IPs - if so, I'll sign up for an account with them. I have a friend who uses AOL who would be interested in helping me with this. Perhaps if we have 10 ISPs which use dynamic IPs or IPs shared by thousands of people, and we keep doing this, anonymous editing will have to be completely prohibited. I once edited constructively with an account, and I know everything that's going wrong with Wikipedia - including allowing anonymous editing. If doing this will help you and other Wikipedians open their eyes to the problems here, I will stop.

Signed, the cousin of the poster on the Village Pump Misc they didn't believe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.6.54 (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Its purpose is to explain subjects in an encyclopedic fashion, and it is to not have any agendas past that.  If you wish to add criticsm to Microsoft's page, consider discussing it with other editors first. A better idea, however, is to contribute to the Criticism of Microsoft page.  It already contains much information about Microsoft's poor buisness practices, and you might be able to make some valuable contributions there.  –Gunslinger47 04:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I just had a look at the Criticism of Microsoft article. It's good. If more of that information were in the Microsoft article, I would not complain. But the Microsoft article contains too little information to help keep users from being cheated by Microsoft, and it's pushed down to the bottom of the article. You need to make the Criticism section longer, and take more information from the good Criticism of Microsoft article, and make sure it's not near the end of the article. I was away for a few days, then I just got AOL, and my cousin has a shared IP offered by SingNet, so I'll be back. --218.186.9.1 10:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Windows 98 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 14:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Mailer Diablo 14:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
This address has again been blocked from editing because it has been used for persistent vandalism of Wikipedia. If you have been affected by this block, but are innocent of any misbehavior, we apologize for the inconvenience. We invite you to register an account to bypass this problem. You might consider contacting the internet service provider of this IP, and perhaps they'll start taking some responsibility for the actions of their customers; then blocks will become less necessary. -- Pilotguy (roger that) 14:39, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Interest in securities on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 17:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. *drew 09:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Vishal
Your recent edit to Vishal (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Sui generis on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 20:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to MapleStory character classes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Nish kid 64 22:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

'''This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. - GI e''' n 07:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 21 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Luna Santin 11:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Nair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Nish kid 64 16:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Anna Kyoyama
Your recent edit to Anna Kyoyama (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Annamite Striped Rabbit. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Lucasbfr 14:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --ZsinjTalk  14:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  --ZsinjTalk  14:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Tenali Rama
Do you know what this film is about?? You put it in List of Disney theatrical animated features and I never heard of it. Georgia guy 14:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Silicon carbide
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to silicon carbide, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Singapore American School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 09:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

August 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Singapore American School, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. SimonD 09:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to CHIJ Secondary School (Toa Payoh). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 15:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Open source. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 20:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. JoshuaZ 20:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 26 2006 (UTC) to Pokémon
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 11:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC) to Mercury (planet)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 05:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Main Page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Daniel Olsen 07:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC) to Paris
Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Ryūlóng 07:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you blank or remove material from a page, as you did to Patriotism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't remove referencing or citations. Gimmetrow 08:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 hour. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. JoJan 08:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC) JoJan 08:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — FireFox  ( talk ) 11:20, 27 August 2006

This is insane
There are 300,000 people on this IP? Man, you guys gotta be real careful about getting banned from places. This IP is more fragile than a Ming dynasty vase on a spider-web floor soaked in Teflon. F l o a t e r F l u s s (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ehhm no edits since August 27, 2006.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   18:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Weird. Looks like I've been having some bad luck; while I was on this IP address I was pounding the keyboard in frustration at getting blocked practically every few days or so, but the insanity suddenly stopped once I transferred to my current IP for unknown reasons. And the red screen of death has practically disappeared from my sight nowadays. --218.186.9.3 08:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * So it's being used by hundreds of thousands of people, and then by no one? Very odd. No edits since 8/2006, as stated above.  Enigma  message Review 07:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Not odd at all. Presumably, the ISP switched to a different IP. —Lowellian (reply) 18:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I wonder how this was implemented. A typical NAT that changes the address and the port is not enough for 300k users. Port number only gives you 2^16 max connections.--Neo139 (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Orita.Sinclair School of Art and New Media
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Orita.Sinclair School of Art and New Media. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Orita.Sinclair School of Art and New Media. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zuraidah Ibrahim


A tag has been placed on Zuraidah Ibrahim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. XinJeisan (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Zuraidah Ibrahim for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Zuraidah Ibrahim, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zuraidah Ibrahim until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.XinJeisan (talk) 04:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nanyang Primary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nanyang Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nanyang Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olinda Cho


The article Olinda Cho has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Anarchyte ( talk  &#124;  work )  08:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)