User talk:202.161.58.88

August 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kim Tae-yeon, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sni56996 (talk) 07:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

List of champions and first runner-ups
Please refrain from discarding changes made to the list of champions and runner-ups, where those are merely deletions of references which are perfectly well-placed. The list has been consistently updated to include WTO and FDI champions and there is not reason for discarding such changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.208.6.251 (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Moot court, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 01:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC) -- You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. El_C 01:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I feel like that was a bit unwarranted. They were trying to help clean up the mess that is Moot Court. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 01:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing back and fourth adding then self-reverting for no apparent reason; done, perhaps, to provoke the content dispute to heat up.El_C 01:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I know. I just assumed they couldn't figure out which version was the correct one, or something. One of the editors that was in the content dispute was blocked indefinitely by Bbb23, so the only thing that I can think of is that the IP editor ''is a sock of HarrietNine. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 01:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Either way, it's bizarre and disruptive—they can't claim testing either, because they've already edited the article extensively. But I'm open to hear their explanation. El_C 01:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about questioning you, El. It just looked a bit odd that they were blocked right after I left a level-1 warning. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 01:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Not at all. Being questioned makes me a better editor and admin. And I get that. I just didn't think warnings were needed for someone trying to stir up and instigate. But it's possible that I misread the situation and was just being paranoid. Certainly, as mentioned, I'm open to a reasonable explanation. El_C 01:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)