User talk:202.27.212.13

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Michael Behe; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

February 2020
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at Michael Behe. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 11:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Esmé has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Esmé was changed by 202.27.212.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909476 on 2020-04-23T08:43:16+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Next Right Thing (Disney song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hillelfrei • talk •  04:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Flatwoods monster—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sports car racing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lavandula has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lavandula was changed by 202.27.212.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911443 on 2020-06-07T03:19:38+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pepper. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pepper was changed by 202.27.212.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946639 on 2020-06-07T03:20:30+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pepper, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 03:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lavender (disambiguation). Materialscientist (talk) 03:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Babylon Bee, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Time Person of the Year. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MerelyPumpkin (talk) 02:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Hanukkah, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The manual of style just wants consistency, there's other BCE still in there. Lectrician2 (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 04:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome
I've noticed you've made quite a number of contributions to Wikipedia already. Why don't you create an account? See more reasons here: WP:Why create an account. AncientWalrus (talk) 07:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Scream VI. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! I saw your edit summary and wanted to clarify that it was not the term "blacklisted" that was commentary that was inappropriate for the article body, but instead the comment "That is not true she left because she follows the truth like her fellow cast mates" that was added. If you have concerns about the accuracy of an article and want to discuss it, the best place to do so is generally on the article's talkpage. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I apologize; I made a mistake. Your edit was actually removing commentary added by a different user. Wikipedialuva (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)