User talk:202.28.62.75

October 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Mosin-Nagant, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 00:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You are using non-reliable sources for this sections. Consider changing them. 202.28.62.75 (talk) 02:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * One of the sources that you're deleting is from Reuters, which is considered as reliable. Please see here. If you have details otherwise, it might be worth mentioning at the recent ANI thread. Tessaract2 Hi! 02:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Reuters is a news agency, something that hardly qualifies as being overly reliable. The article they published itself is unreliable as it is not factual. For example, I could write that the US military still uses the M1903 Springfield rifle for ceremonial purposes, but I could not write that the US military is issuing M1903 rifles to poorly trained recruits. Other than the resources, the section itself was fine. I would suggest that you consider finding new sources. 202.28.62.75 (talk) 03:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I just re-read the paragraph you were removing, and it doesn't say anything about "poorly trained recruits" or anything about training levels at all. I don't think you've got anything to worry about in this case. If you still think it's an issue, once your block expires you should bring it up at the talk page instead of removing it again on your own, as it's a clearly contentious removal, and if a change you make is reverted, you should discuss it.
 * With that being said, I'd like to quickly apologize for assuming that you were trying to be intentionally disruptive, as that doesn't seem to be your intentions here. I hope you get back to some constructive editing once the block expires. Tessaract2 Hi! 13:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mosin–Nagant, you may be blocked from editing. Reuters is a reliable source, per WP:RSP. Tessaract2 Hi! 01:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mosin–Nagant. Tessaract2 Hi! 01:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tessaract2 Hi! 01:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.