User talk:2021Coco

October 2023
Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Patcham High School have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 04:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi
 * It is not advertising I was simply updating the information on behalf of Patcham High School and highlighting what our school reflects. Please can you change them back. If you have any concerns you are welcome to contact the Headmaster - Mr McKee who has specifically asked me to update it, for example the ofsted report is an old one, the logo is no longer new. If there are any concerns, do drop me a line. Thanks. 2021Coco (talk) 15:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I wondered if that was the case. If you are employed by the school or are editing at their request then you have a conflict of interest and should not directly edit the article for the most part and should instead make edit requests at the article talk page.  If you do edit the article, simple factual changes like updating information about the logo or updating the Principal/Headmaster/Head teacher etc. are unlikely to be objected to, but you definitely should not be removing information like the old Ofsted ratings.  Being old is not a valid reason to remove them.  If the concern is that those ratings reflect poorly on the school, that is also not a valid reason.  You should also not add wording like the "Patcham High School are proud to say..." paragraph.  It reads like a mission statement, and content like that does not belong here. Squeakachu (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your explanation. Please could you remove 'new' from logo as it is not new. Please can you update the ofsted rating. The old ones weren't removed because they reflected poorly on the school. We have been registered 'good' for many years. If the old ones cannot be removed, please can you add the new rating which was done this year? I hope you can assist and sorry for any trouble I may have caused. 2021Coco (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I had already removed the "new" description of the logo and added the 2023 Ofsted rating and source to the same sentence as the 2013 and 2017 ratings. I thought about it last night and this morning and decided to move the 2023 rating to a separate sentence.  I would guess that anyone looking at the article is probably more interested in the school's current information than its historical information, so I think it serves the reader to give the most up-to-date rating more prominent placement rather than lumping it together with the old stuff. Squeakachu (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your help with this and rethinking the Ofsted information, It is appreciated. 2A02:C7C:7D0D:4000:8CF4:7B8D:555C:AACF (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2023 (UTC)