User talk:203.109.254.58

Old messages
Hello 203.109.254.58, it appears we're both putting through articles via the same IP. I suppose it's an Ihug proxy farm - do you use Ihug too? It's funny but we've both been editing the same articles even.

Hey 203 - thanks for working on adapting 1911 text for Wikipedia. We do, however, have a standard way to reference this material. See below:

==Reference==
 * Original text from 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica

Have a good day!

--mav 08:55 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Loyalty
I have nominated Loyalty, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Loyalty. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Paul D'Amour
Hello, 203.109.254.58,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Polyamorph and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Paul D'Amour should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Articles for deletion/Paul D'Amour.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Polyamorph (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

"Parliamentary" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Parliamentary and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)