User talk:203.118.57.20

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (203.118.57.20) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  01:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest - Royal Albatross
Hello, 203.118.57.20. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Xaiver0510 (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Royal Albatross
What is your evidence that the Royal Albatross is not part of RWS when it is sitting there between Adventure Cove and SEA Aquarium? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.118.57.20 (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Please cite sources Royal Albatross belongs to RWS. Sources quoted show that it is privately owned, not by RWS. Even it is moored at RWS, it is not part of RWS. We can extend the logic that Sentosa Island belongs to Singapore, so if Royal Albatross is moored at RWS, RWS is situated on Sentosa, Sentosa belongs to Singapore then Royal Albatross belongs to Singapore. We will agree that it does not work that way, so by the same logic, Royal Albatross is not part of RWS.
 * RWS article is describing RWS, does the royal albatross belong to RWS? If yes, then RWS article can have a section about it. Please cite a source for it also
 * You can reply here as I will be watching this page also. --Xaiver0510 (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I think you are mistaken between the business entity and the place called RWS. Restaurants like Hard Rock Cafe are not owned by RWS but are still considered part of RWS and are featured in this article. Does this make sense to you? 203.118.57.20 (talk) 02:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I have been thinking about it and based on that RWS website does also list it on their official website, I will say you are correct and the information should show in the article.
 * On a separate note, do you have any connections with Royal Albatross as per the COI notice I posted above this? Just for record purposes, it will be good if you can confirm if there is any relationship. If you are interested in more long-term editing, to create a Wikipedia account! --Xaiver0510 (talk) 08:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. Then perhaps I defer to you to reverse the removal of the instances of Royal Albatross since I have now learned about COI editing and that I do have connections with them, although I am very sure my words are informational, holds integrity, and are non-promotional. 203.118.57.20 (talk) 07:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)