User talk:203.17.70.26

November 2015
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Talk:Pope Francis, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Free Papua Movement, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anton LaVey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Chevvin 04:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Mark Zuckerberg. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Wikipedia is not the appropriate venue for your complaints regarding Facebook's actions. Zim Zala Bim  talk 01:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Mark Zuckerberg
See WP:NOTFORUM. Your post has nothing to do with improving the biographical article Mark Zuckerberg. If you continue, it will be treated as edit warring.  General Ization Talk  01:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You are talking to a library IDIOT. Hundreds of users here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  203.17.70.26 (talk) 01:34, 31 December 2019 (UTC) ‎
 * Then all the patrons of the library who might otherwise use this IP will have you to thank for losing the ability to edit Wikipedia for a time. Perhaps this will prompt the library staff to execute better oversight over Internet use.  General Ization Talk  01:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:203.17.70.26, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  General Ization Talk  01:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022
Hello, I'm Anupam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Syzygium smithii have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. AnupamTalk 06:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

You are talking to the brisbane state library where several hundred computers share the same ip you lame retarded dumbfuckers. Whoever you are messaging probably left laughing his head off ages ago. Twats.

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page NASASpaceFlight.com has been reverted. Your edit here to NASASpaceFlight.com was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/nasaspaceflight, https://www.facebook.com/groups/nasaspaceflight) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


 * Its not a reference. These are external links to the websites the article is discussing. 203.17.70.26 (talk) 03:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Talk:Trans woman are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Funcrunch (talk) 04:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Historicity of Jesus, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Historicity of Jesus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  06:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Are you kidding? Controversial??? There are talking animals and bushes, a magical boat, zombies, unicorns and even a sky wizard in the Bible. Yet this article is siding with the insane idea that Jesus was a real person and the gospels are reliable historical documents. Grow the hell up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.17.70.26 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The Gospels are reliable historical documents - they are documents that exist within history, and reliably tell us what the author or authors considered to be true, and what their audience considered to be plausible. This is evidence. Describing your edits as "controversial" is in fact the height of charity, seeing as you changed many well-sourced statements to their negation without providing your own sources. Exercise some epistemic humility. 203.17.70.26 (talk) 06:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Historicity of Jesus, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  06:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Historicity of Jesus.  General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 06:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)