User talk:203.192.209.6

June 2021
Hello, I'm Manticore. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Machias, Maine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Manti  core  02:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.-- Ponyo bons mots 19:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gatimaan Express have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gatimaan Express was changed by 203.192.209.6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965894 on 2023-03-20T08:11:19+00:00

February 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vyacheslav Molotov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

You reverted a sourced edit (in fact an edit that added no new content, simply bringing material into the lede), and then proceeded to accuse me of vandalism, a false accusation that cannot be justified by the edit by any reasonable person, indicating that you are engaging in a bad faith campaign with some ulterior motive. Desist now. 203.192.209.6 (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Apologies. While my revert was valid, I was mistaken in interpreting your action and misread the situation. The reason I reverted you was due to lack of a reliable source to support a quote using non-neutral words (ie puffery), and that the reference given was not clearly defined or understood. I've struck out my comment above as a gesture of good faith.
 * As for the quote you added, I must insist that the reference be better/clearer defined, as "Anderson" is not understood who or what is being referenced. Also see my reply here if you have not. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2024 (UTC)