User talk:203.192.232.224

March 2018
Hello, I'm Dane. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Hugh of Fauquembergues— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. --  Dane talk  17:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hugh of Fauquembergues. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh of Fauquembergues, you may be blocked from editing. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh of Fauquembergues. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 17:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)