User talk:203.194.51.42

January 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Macmillan Publishers (United States) ‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please desist from altering reflist columns and widths to your personal preference on this and many other articles. '' — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 18:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Asus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 21:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Stephen Tong, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sophiajoanne (talk) 04:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Clear
Please don't use the template unless you understand what it does. It is meant to clear floating elements. So things like thumbnails or commons template boxes. However, it should not merely be placed after any floating element, but rather one where it would be inappropriate for the following text to get reflowed by it (see the template documentation for an example). Merely using it for everything would leave unnecessary and unsightly gaps. On Scaphism, it wasn't even needed because there weren't any floating elements. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 07:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, please stop ignoring messages from other users. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and being an IP editor does not excuse continuing to do something incorrectly after informed about it. Opencooper (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lamb of God have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:53, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Article appendices
Please stop systematically changing the names of appendices in articles. On Wikipedia, there is no prescribed standard for naming notes and references sections per MOS:NOTES and WP:CITEVAR. Editors have some freedom (within reason) to choose headings when they create articles. If you want to impose a standard system then you must first get it agreed on a policy discussion page and have it written into the guidelines.

Based on your editing style, I am pretty sure I have talked to you about this before and blocked a number of IP addresses because you fail to listen. Because of that, and because you are so prolific and persistent with this problem, I am simply going to revert all your work. It is too time consuming to go through your edits manually to retain what is actually useful. So if you don't want all your work wiped out in the future, please stop doing this. SpinningSpark 08:07, 27 July 2019 (UTC)