User talk:203.2.159.130

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Actually
Is not what is required in wikipedia - WP:RS is what is required... JarrahTree 05:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, I'm Abasteraster. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Andrew Dillon (sports administrator) have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abasteraster (talk) 00:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Defamatory? Libellous? These are opinions, reports and observations based on weeks of proof and bias. They were legitimate comments and should not have been removed. 203.2.159.130 (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, please don't take the revert personally. Wikipedia has very strict rules on how we can write about living persons, which you can read about at WP:BLP. Basically, articles must be written in a neutral tone, and potentially contentious material must be verified in a high-quality third-party source. Calling Dillon "inept" and "inadequate" in the lede is an expression of personal opinion, which isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia.
 * It does look like there's some controversy about Dillon in the news. You could potentially add a section to the article that describes and fairly represents the situation, including any notable criticism and defenses of his actions or statements. Just be very careful to follow the rules, and if you need assistance, you can always ask a more experienced editor at the Teahouse. Abasteraster (talk) 02:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Abasteraster, did you see the filter log? Thank you for reverting and explaining. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey @Drmies. To be honest, I'm not quite sure what I'm supposed to be seeing in the filter log. If you could clarify that for me, I'd appreciate it :) Abasteraster (talk) 02:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)