User talk:203.213.125.102

August 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to European exploration of Australia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 04:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at European exploration of Australia. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: European exploration of Australia was changed by 203.213.125.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959849 on 2015-08-03T04:52:01+00:00.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Saint Timothy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pokechu22 (talk) 04:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism, as done at Saint Timothy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:.  Goodnight  mush Talk 04:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Omni Flames. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jordan has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Omni Flames  ( talk   contribs ) 06:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Galah. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Galah was changed by 203.213.125.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894665 on 2016-03-23T06:09:37+00:00.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Galah. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Steve Quinn (talk) 06:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Pterodactylus seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Fox and the Grapes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MRD2014 T C 01:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Aspening. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to History of Western Australia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Aspening (talk) 04:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cylinder seal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Se by  15  41  01:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Western Australian gold rushes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Western Australian gold rushes was changed by 203.213.125.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926645 on 2020-08-19T06:21:25+00:00