User talk:203.39.128.90

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Emerald, Victoria has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Emerald, Victoria was changed by 203.39.128.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863259 on 2016-10-21T04:02:52+00:00.

December 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Casey Cardinia Libraries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk questions
You have responses to both.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Northern Irish supercentenarians, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.


 * Note that restoring a prod template after an article has been de-prodded is not allowed, as per WP:DEPROD. North America1000 01:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Northern Irish supercentenarians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. North America1000 01:21, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Indian Film Festival of Melbourne‎, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Indian Film Festival of Melbourne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at Indian Film Festival of Melbourne. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Talkback
~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 04:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Telstra People's Choice Award, you may be blocked from editing. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mitu Bhowmick Lange, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Tera TIX  04:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

This IP address is located in a public library. Hence MANY people access the internet from this terminal. Therefore this means all people who use this terminal but do not have a Wikipedia account have been blocked because of one anonymous user. That is just plain silly.


 * I have unblocked the IP to see what happens. However, if the previous edits that it was making are made again, I will have no option but to block again, as they were serious violations of our living persons policy. Black Kite (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

List of oldest people
Because you participated in a discussion about merging three lists of the world's oldest people, you are invited to comment on the updated proposal at Talk:List of the verified oldest people. — JFG talk 08:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)