User talk:203.54.207.110

November 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bob Jeffery—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Everedux  (talk)  01:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Hello, I'm Tdts5. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to HMS Sirius (1786)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Tdts5 (talk) 04:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lady Penrhyn (1786 ship). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tdts5 (talk) 04:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charlotte (1784 ship). Tdts5 (talk) 04:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)im

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 06:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism (as caught by filters}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: .  Alexf(talk) 23:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Leaf—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leaf. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Leaf was changed by 203.54.207.110 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853485 on 2020-05-18T05:44:03+00:00