User talk:203.87.133.162

May 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lubao, Pampanga— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 06:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from D' Kilabots Pogi Brothers Weh?! with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Cine Mo!, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LG-Gunther : Talk  03:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ole Rømer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ole Rømer was changed by 203.87.133.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951385 on 2016-08-29T12:22:18+00:00.

February 2017
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of the Philippines (1965–86)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jus da  fax   06:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Instantmatter49. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ip Man have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Instantmatter49 (talk) 04:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to The Sea of Monsters, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Geoffrey Chaucer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Liturgical year. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 02:04, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Chiong murder case, you may be blocked from editing. Aspening (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bianca Manalo. RA 0808 talkcontribs 15:59, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Siquijor— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)