User talk:203.87.194.142/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --A NobodyMy talk 07:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * PS: Input what you want, but don't change the number of episodes; it's confirmed to have 26 episodes in two seasons. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Please discuss issues on the article's talk page and if both of you can't agree, try to involve others. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Your edit on Sasami: Magical Girls Club
I appreciate your edit on the article, but the source you provided (http://www.shoujoai.com/forum/topic_show.pl?pid=816869;hl=Sasami#pid816869) is from a forum, which is unacceptable under WP:SOURCE. I suggest you read it first before putting your edit back. Also, read the talk page or talk to Euryalus; he doesn't agree with your edit either. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Kenji Harima article
This article was nominated for deletion, which resulted in a merge of the content and redirect of the article to List of School Rumble characters. Please stop recreating the article or your edits may be seen as disruptive. -- Broken Sphere Msg me 16:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Manila Film Center has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59zPM0v1ihA). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

DMC4
As per WP:LEAD the lead section should summarise the entire article including reception. Stop removing the content about reception in the lead please. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 07:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As long as there's a summarising paragraph about the reception in the lead, I'm satisfied. Feel free to change it, just don't remove it completely. Thanks. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 09:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please try and cooperate. This article is a GA, and therefore it needs a good lead. Without the reception content in the intro, it's not comprehensive, and therefore does not meet WP:GA?. Do you follow my drift? For examples, see Devil May Cry, DMC2, and DMC3. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean, but that summary was there when the article became a GA, and then someone wiped it out. But if you want to alter it, no one's stopping you. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 10:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * And BTW, I'm not vandalising the article so reporting me to WP:AIV was completely inappropriate. You really need to read WP:VAN because you seriously have no clue what vandalism is. 84.215.17.68 (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

DMC 4
I wanted to talk to you about the reception section in your DMC 4 article. You claimed that my sources were unprofessional and that you don't need fan reaction. Do keep in mind that the articles I got FOR my edit were not unprofessional reviews. Just because the sites are not KNOWN doesn’t mean they are NOT professional. In fact I have more than just THOSE sites. Keep in mind that the sites that I did get were FROM metacritic. The same site YOU linked.I did take a good look at the reception and I merely pointed out the CRITISISM of that THROUGH the sites that the article has listed. AKA Metacritic and Gamerankings. I took SOURCES from that page. They are by no mean unprofessional. So my edit in DMC 4 wasn't that far off. I listed several sources ON your discussion page as well as POSITIVE reviews that even supported the same complaint. If you want me to list them again for you I will.

(TCT (talk) 11:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC))

Gold Ochre and Pink Beige
Hi,

In regards to List of Crayola crayon colors

I have long suspected that Gold Ochre turned into Maize. I haven't been able to find any solid proof of this... no images of the crayon or samples of Gold Ochre VS. Maize on paper. That's why I have hesitated to put it in the article. I'm not sure we should change the If you have some photos or official documentation from Crayola or a Crayola employee, that would be great.

That said, there IS proof on Crayola's site that Gold Ochre is/was a real color. Look here: http://www.crayola.com/colorcensus/history/history.cfm?id=gold%20ochre

Pink Beige, however, does not register and should be reverted. And I'm not sure temporary re-naming of crayons should be listed here... it could get too confusing with the State crayons, the Discovery tins, etc. http://www.crayola.com/colorcensus/history/history.cfm?id=pink%20beige - page not found

Modify the end of the URL to check for other old renamed colors. (use %20 instead of spacebar).

I'm not sure if the website you're citing as a reference is a reliable source (it would be if it had pictures), though I have enjoyed reading it: http://maxpages.com/lostcrayolas/

Thanks for cleaning up the references, too! Have a great evening. Crayonsman (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I had to undo your modifications to the crayon colors page. The sources you cited are essentially just fan comments and cannot be used to confirm anything. I'm assuming you're new to Wikipedia because you don't have an account. Your content must be verifiable. Crayonsman (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I must say, I was a little surprised to see the amount of references for the List of Crayola crayon colors article spike from 17 to 50+ overnight. It makes the article look very sloppy. Also, I think we need to take the earliest date of a crayon's introduction off of Crayola's website, so I'm going to have to comb over the article and redo half of your work. I know for a fact that Jazzberry Jam, Mango Tango, Wild Blue Yonder, and Inchworm were all introduced at the very same time in 2003. I have an original package with all four of them in it that I purchased and left sealed in 2003.

Also, your corrections of the spellings of Inchworm and Pink Sherbert are incorrect. Here is photographic proof: http://www.flickr.com/photos/30556012@N02/3477143650/

Crayonsman (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Frehley Space Ace 20:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 03:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to File talk:Garrote Execution - 1901.png, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: File talk:Garrote Execution - 1901.png was changed by 203.87.194.142 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-05-15T03:11:35+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)