User talk:203.95.223.254

December 2018
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Latte— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sacred language
I just reverted your edit to the above article, because it had no source citations, and contradicted a sourced statement in a related article.

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Quisqualis (talk) 09:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. Some of your recent edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia or add false information, as you did at Cyclone Sidr, you may be blocked from editing.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 11:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ustaad


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ustaad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Works For Humanity Foundation


A tag has been placed on Draft:Works For Humanity Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''I am guessing you are likely the same person who went around and did this last time, changing colors of national teams mostly in templates. You know that people disagree, so start a discussion on your changes. Keep edit warring and I will have no issue with reporting you.'' TylerBurden (talk) 03:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/45.120.113.2. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 06:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Netherlands T20I Cricket Captains. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 07:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Lebanon national football team managers. Nehme1499 13:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Reverted all your edits as block evasion
All your edits over the last two days have been reverted, as you are evading a block/ban. To any editor reading this, you are welcome to reinstate their edits (but you then take responsibility for them, as if they were your own). Mako001 (C) (T)  14:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)