User talk:203.99.211.134

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kavita Krishnan, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey!
According to Talk:Cyclic_model put your stuff in the Hindu cosmology! Don't mix up your mythological stuff that uses Hindu astrology (which is disproved pseudo-science) with science! If you want your new section to survive, then you must cite some old Hindu Astrology sources. The blog referred to mixes up science with astrology (the Nakshatra – yes I happen to know a lot about astrology) such stuff is one-source pseudoscience, which is not accepted on Wikipedia. If there is no other source than that idiotic blog, you should not bother keeping the material on Wikipedia at all. Rursus dixit. ( m bork3 !) 16:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)