User talk:204.112.217.234

June 2021
Hello, I'm 1TWO3Writer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Thomas Christopher Collins seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   1TWO3Writer (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Thomas Christopher Collins. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   1TWO3Writer (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Thomas Christopher Collins, you may be blocked from editing.   1TWO3Writer (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Thomas Christopher Collins. '' Please write your edit in a neutral tone. Failure to comply with this will result in a potential block.'' 1TWO3Writer (talk) 21:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

About Your Edit
Hi, your addition to the article did not follow the neutrality expected in a Wikipedia article. Your most recent edit is more acceptable as it cites the source in the article while remaining neutral. Also, please do not accuse other users of censorship. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk page message and Edit reverts
Hi, I have reverted your edit because I believe that the citation doesn't support the claim given in the article. In your edit you said that "He has stated that the church should not apologise for its role in the residential school system that resulted in many children's deaths." while your source basically said that the subject in the article commented, on Justin Trudeau's claim that a request for Pope Francis to apologize in 2017 has been made, something along the lines of the remarks are unfair because Pope Benedict XVI already apologized in 2009. In my talk page, you said "screw the catholic church and their murdering of children! quite apologising for them!", I honestly cant see how that relates to your edit. Justiyaya (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)