User talk:204.126.146.202

No United States before 1776?
Ah but there is the History of the United States before 1776 and that is the issue here. Look at any textbook on the history of the United States and tell me when they begin. Rjensen (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Warning: do not vandalize Biographies of Living Persons with unsourced pejorative content
A user from the IP address has been adding unsourced non-neutral pejorative content on pages about living persons. As a warning, please follow Wikipedia policy as noted here: "Contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.  Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing." — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaziDaoren (talk • contribs) 14:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Yaush. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Wau because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Yaush (talk) 22:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

"Who" in Clarence "Frogman" Henry
In Clarence "Frogman" Henry you added added "(who?)" in the text. A better way to do this is to use the template who. This will cause it to be displayed in a standard way, and also put the article in to the category Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases, making it more likely to be discovered and cleaned up. I've changed this for you:. Thanks for your contribution. TJRC (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to June 7 does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! ''Please review my edit summaries and discuss the issue. Merely restoring the edit without discussion will not resolve the issue. '' Sum mer PhD  (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to September 7. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ''Your insistence on including Paiute Native Americans appears to be original research WP:OR and this is prohibited on wikipedia. If you must include this information, you must provide references for your assertation, or this becomes defamation which is illegal. You are also close to violating the WP:3RR rule, if you revert this one more time you will be banned from posting. '' Timmccloud (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Jewish emancipation
Hi. Just to let you know that I've reverted again the change you made to the September 28 article. The Jewish emancipation article only backed up the statement you added because you also added it there. The Jewish emancipation article unequivocally states that the French were first, and indeed it appears to only consider European countries. I don't know why this should be, but what I do know is there is no cite supporting the claim that the United States were first, and the date added there for the US is uncited. I've also done a little bit of googling around and can find nothing to support this claim.

If you have any source that supports the 1789 date (and specifically describes it as an emancipation of Jews) then please add it to the Jewish emancipation article first. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to March 3 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 17:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015
Hello, I'm Bzuk. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Dolotta. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to September 7 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dolotta (talk) 13:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Sumner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Britain. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 06:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)