User talk:204.239.11.6

Baptism in Jesus' Name
I reversed your edit to the article Oneness Pentecostalism. While I fully agree with your edit (I'm an Apostolic Pentecostal), such a statement needs a source. If you can find a reliable online source to back up the statement, please feel free to post it again. BroWCarey (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Robert E. Gerstung, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Acabashi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Philadelphia Eagles because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Acabashi (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014
Please note that in the article "Neo-Catholicism" I undid your reference to the "Storcke" (sic) article "fairly presenting the opposing view," because Thomas Storck opposes the view that NFP is wrong, but that is not the view the article you edited discusses, which is that NFP should be a "lifestyle" as opposed to a method used for grave or serious reasons. The Church has never taught that NPF is a "lifestyle," which is only the opinion of lay promoters of NFP. Also, this is not a debate over NFP in which "opposing views" would be presented. There is no debate: NFP is morally permissible. The issue, rather, is the progressive view which advocates its routine use as part of one's lifestyle, something the Church has never taught. Also, your edit lacked the proper tags and was inserted in the middle of a footnote, disrupting its structure and generating red flags in the article text. Circa Corleone (talk) 14:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Neo-Catholicism. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CaptRik (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Drmies (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * You have a clear COI, as your whois reveals at first glance, and you may not turn that article into a company directory or, worse, a brochure. Drmies (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Mikemoral. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Battle of Upperville— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —mikemoral (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ian Eastwood— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ian Eastwood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Country pop seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  00:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alan Koch (soccer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Voris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Stay safe and well, -- Total Eclipse 2017  (My profile &#124; My contribs &#124; speak to me) 20:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Voris, you may be blocked from editing. xRENEGADEx 21:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Garth Drabinsky, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 09:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm 3PPYB6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bombardier Global Express have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 17:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bombardier Global Express. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Tsai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)