User talk:204.68.207.13

Discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archive 9
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Usernamekiran/Archive 9. — usernamekiran (talk)  15:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Washington Examiner, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Indigenous girl (talk) 15:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Washington Examiner; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dyrnych (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * It's obvious that there's a content dispute here. You're welcome to follow WP procedure and argue your point on the article's talk page, but stop edit warring your proposed version. Dyrnych (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Your recent editing history at Washington Examiner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You're at 10+ edits now, with no attempt to resolve your dispute through appropriate means. Knock it off. Dyrnych (talk) 16:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Reported on Twitter
https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1202607705032146944 -- Jibal (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Berrely. I noticed that in this edit to Kyle Mitchell, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • Talk to me∕What have I been doing 12:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)