User talk:204.8.164.50

December 2012
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Arizona State Sun Devils, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arizona State Sun Devils. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arizona State Sun Devils was changed by 204.8.164.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876865 on 2012-12-14T16:41:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm James086. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Illinois, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  James086 Talk  17:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Reggie White because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 15:37, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dennis Rodman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dennis Rodman was changed by 204.8.164.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951005 on 2013-03-07T15:46:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reggie White, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Reggie White was changed by 204.8.164.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861588 on 2013-03-07T16:08:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dennis Rodman. Widr (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Matthewrbowker. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Demeter, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Matthewrbowker  Make a comment! 19:01, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apollo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Apollo, you may be blocked from editing. Haploidavey (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rochelle, Illinois, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rochelle, Illinois was changed by 204.8.164.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879477 on 2013-10-18T15:35:49+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at First Punic War, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582377220 your edit] to Robert F. Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Cheddar cheese, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Frankenstein— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  15:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frankenstein with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  15:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Crime Syndicate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 19:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Women in the American Revolution has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of religions and spiritual traditions. Cl ea n Co py talk 23:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, I'm AntiCedros. An edit that you recently made to Junk food seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! AntiCedros (talk) 17:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Pride and Prejudice. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Eyebeller (talk) 17:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)